green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Warner v. Astrue
See Harman v. Apfel, 211 F.3d 1172, 1179-80 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1038 , 121 S.Ct. 628 , 148 L.Ed.2d 537 (2000) (reviewing court properly may consider materials submitted to the Appeals Council when the Appeals Council addressed the materials in denying review); Ramirez v. Shalala, 8 F.3d 1449, 1452 (9th Cir.1993) (“Ramirez”) (“although the Appeals Council declined to review the decision of the ALJ, it reached this ruling after considering the case on the merits; examining the entire record, including the additional material; and concluding that the ALJ’s decision was prop…
cited
Cited "see"
JONKER v. Astrue
See Harman v. Apfel, 211 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1038 , 121 S.Ct. 628 , 148 L.Ed.2d 537 (2000); Kail v. Heckler, 722 F.2d 1496, 1497 (9th Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. Astrue
See Harman v. Apfel, 211 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir.) (holding that the district court’s decision whether to remand for further proceedings or payment of benefits is discretionary and is subject to review for abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1038 , 121 S.Ct. 628 , 148 L.Ed.2d 537 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Peake v. Chevron Shipping Co.
See Harman v. Apfel, 211 F.3d 1172, 1175 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1038 , 121 S.Ct. 628 , 148 L.Ed.2d 537 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lange v. Apfel
See Harman v. Apfel, 211 F.3d 1172, 1179-80 (9th Cir.2000) (holding that the court could consider additional materials that the ALJ did not have because the materials had been submitted to and addressed by the Appeals Council), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1038 , 121 S.Ct. 628 , 148 L.Ed.2d 537 (2002); Smith v. Bowen, 849 F.2d 1222, 1225 (9th Cir.1988) (holding that medical evaluations made after the expiration of a claimant's insured status are relevant to an evaluation of the pre-expiration condition). .
cited
Cited "see"
Walker v. Barnhart
See Harman v. Apfel, 211 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1038 , 121 S.Ct. 628 , 148 L.Ed.2d 537 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Booth v. Barnhart
See Harman v. Apfel, 211 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir.) (holding that the district court’s decision whether to remand for further proceedings or payment of benefits is discretionary and is subject to review for abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1038 , 121 S.Ct. 628 , 148 L.Ed.2d 537 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Clark v. Massanari
See Harman v. Apfel, 211 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 S.Ct. 1038 , 121 S.Ct. 628 , 148 L.Ed.2d 537 (2000); Hudson v. Bowen, 849 F.2d 433, 435 (9th Cir. 1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Buchanan
v.
Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
v.
Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
No. 00-5077.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 2000.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.