Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. United States, 531 U.S. 1102 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. United States, 531 U.S. 1102 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“district court's rule 403 balancing stands unless it is an abuse of discretion.”
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Jose A. Otero-Mendez (ca1, 2001-12-10)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Jose A. Otero-Mendez
1st Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
district court's rule 403 balancing stands unless it is an abuse of discretion.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Marston
1st Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Hernández, 218 F.3d 58 , 63 n. 3 (1st Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1103 , 121 S.Ct. 840 , 148 L.Ed.2d 720 (2001). 2 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Olvera
5th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ceballos-Torres, 218 F.3d 409, 412-15 (5th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1102 , 121 S.Ct. 839 , 148 L.Ed.2d 720 (2001).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Benson
4th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ceballos-Torres, 218 F.3d 409, 414 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1102 , 121 S.Ct. 839 , 148 L.Ed.2d 720 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Iiland
10th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ceballos-Torres, 218 F.3d 409 (5th Cir.2000), modified on denial of rehearing, 226 F.3d 651 (5th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1102 , 121 S.Ct. 839 , 148 L.Ed.2d 720 (2001); United States v. Speight, 95 F.Supp.2d 595 (S.D.W.Va.2000).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Sharpton
1st Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Bonilla, 648 F.2d 1373 , 1377-78 (1st Cir.1981) (holding that, where 18 U.S.C. § 1382 prosecution proceeds on trespass theory, it must be shown that defendant had notice that entry onto military property was in fact prohibited). 2 We have described the standard of review for insufficiency of the evidence claims as “formidable.” United States v. Loder, 23 F.3d 586, 589 (1st Cir.1994). “[WJe must affirm unless the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the . government, could not have persuaded any trier of fact of the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable …
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Clarence J. Lomax
4th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Ceballos-Torres, 218 F.3d 409, 413 (5th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1102 , 121 S.Ct. 839 , 148 L.Ed.2d 720 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gonzalez-Gonzalez
v.
United States
No. 00-7356.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 2001.
531 U.S. 1102
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: First Circuit (1)

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.