McGuire v. Rock Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 531 U.S. 1204 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
McGuire v. Rock Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 531 U.S. 1204 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (32 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Chandler v. Crosby (flmd, 2006-02-08)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Chandler v. Crosby
M.D. Fla. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chandler v. United States, 218 F.3d 1305, 1315 (11th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1204 , 121 S.Ct. 1217 , 149 L.Ed.2d 129 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Dale Eyman
2d Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chandler v. United States, 218 F.3d 1305 , 1316 n. 16 (11th Cir.2000) (en banc), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1204 , 121 S.Ct. 1217 , 149 L.Ed.2d 129 (2001); Tarver v. Hopper, 169 F.3d 710, 716 (11th Cir.1999); Atkins v. Singletary, 965 F.2d 952, 959-60 (11th Cir.1992).
cited Cited "see" Eddie Albert Crawford v. Frederick Head
11th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chandler v. United States, 218 F.3d 1305, 1316 (11th Cir.2000) (en banc), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1204 , 121 S.Ct. 1217 , 149 L.Ed.2d 129 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Willie James Hall v. Frederick Head
11th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chandler v. United States, 218 F.3d 1305, 1314 (11th Cir.2000) (observing that “[c]ourts must ‘indulge [the] strong presumption’ that counsel’s performance was reasonable” and that in light of this “strong presumption in favor of competence, the petitioner’s burden of persuasion — though the presumption is not insurmountable — is a heavy one”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1204 , 121 S.Ct. 1217 , 149 L.Ed.2d 129 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Bullock v. Carver
10th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
As the Supreme Court recently explained when discussing Strickland’s first prong, “[tjhe relevant question is not whether counsel’s choices *1048 were strategic, but whether they were reasonable.” Roe, 528 U.S. at 480 , 120 S.Ct. 1029 (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 688 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 ); see Chandler v. United States, 218 F.3d 1305, 1315-16 (11th Cir.2000) (en banc) (explaining how ultimate inquiry under Strickland’s first prong is whether counsel’s performance was objectively reasonable), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1204 , 121 S.Ct. 1217 , 149 L.Ed.2d 129 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Ralph Thompson, Jr. v. State of Tennessee
Tenn. Crim. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chandler -13- v. United States, 218 F.3d 1305, 1315-16 (11th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1204 , 121 S. Ct. 1217 , 149 L.
discussed Cited "see" Fugate v. Head (2×)
11th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chandler v. United States, 218 F.3d 1305, 1316 (11th Cir.2000) (en banc ), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 121 S.Ct. 1217 , 149 L.Ed.2d 129 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Anthony Keith Johnson v. State of Alabama
11th Cir. · 2001 · signal: accord · confidence high
This requires showing that counsel’s errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.” Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 390 , 120 S.Ct. 1495, 1511 , 146 L.Ed.2d 389 (2000) (internal quotation marks omitted) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)); accord, Chandler v. United States, 218 F.3d 1305, 1312-1313 (11th Cir.2000) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1217 , 149 L.Ed.2d 129 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McGuire
v.
Rock County Board of Supervisors Musser v. Salomon/Smith Barney, Inc. Judge v. Hatch Hogan Management Services v. Martino, dba North Georgia Orthopaedics Judge v. Superior Court of California Rodriguez Reyna v. Stewart Huff v. Luebbers, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center Broseh v. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division Jackson v. Ramsey County Leverton v. City of Houston Police Department Hawkins v. United States Luria v. Luria Washington v. Louisiana State Board of Private Security Examiners Banks v. Pizzingrilli, Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Littlejohn v. United States Denney v. Kansas Tilli v. Department of Housing and Urban Development Ellis v. United States Norwood v. United States
No. 00-640; No. 00-695; No. 00-702; No. 00-706; No. 00-766; No. 00-5597; No. 00-5693; No. 00-5758; No. 00-6004; No. 00-6200; No. 00-6683; No. 00-6779; No. 00-6894; No. 00-6950; No. 00-6981; No. 00-7301; No. 00-7341; No. 00-7372; No. 00-7374.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 26, 2001.
531 U.S. 1204
Published

[*1204] ante, p. 1073;

ante, p. 1075;

ante, p. 1075;

ante, p. 1075;

ante, p. 1077;

ante, p. 945;

ante, p. 912;

ante, p. 1081;

ante, p. 967;

ante, p. 1016;

ante, p. 1025;

ante, p. 1056;

ante, p. 1090;

ante, p. 1092;

ante, p. 1057;

[*1205] No. 00-7301. No. 00-7341. No. 00-7372. No. 00-7374.

ante, p. 1130;

ante, p. 1130;

ante, p. 1103; and

ante, p. 1103. Petitions for rehearing denied.