green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
McIntosh Ex Rel. Estate of McIntosh v. Smith
See Brown v. Bryan County, Oklahoma, 219 F.3d 450, 458 (5th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1007 , 121 S.Ct. 1734 , 149 L.Ed.2d 658 (2001). “[U]nder certain circumstances, § 1983 liability can attach for a single decision not to train [or supervise] an individual officer even where there has been no pattern of previous constitutional violations.” Id. at 459.
discussed
Cited "see"
Caraccilo v. Village of Seneca Falls, NY
(2×)
In undertaking this analysis, it must also be borne in mind that “the closer the employee’s speech reflects on matters of public concern, the greater must be the employer’s showing that the speech is like *415 ly to be disruptive before it may be punished.” Jeffries, 52 F.3d at 13 ; accord Belk v. City of Eldon, 228 F.3d 872, 881 (8th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1008 , 121 S.Ct. 1734 , 149 L.Ed.2d 659 (2001); Lewis, 165 F.3d at 162 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc. v. Shaw Environmental, Inc.
(2×)
See Moore U.S.A, Inc. v. Standard Register Co., 229 F.3d 1091, 1116 (Fed.Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1008 , 121 S.Ct. 1734 , 149 L.Ed.2d 659 (2001); Tesseron, Ltd. v. R.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Glandon v. Keokuk County Health Center
(2×)
If the speech addresses a matter of public concern, the court then must balance the “interests of the [employee] as a citizen, in commenting upon matters of public concern and the interest of the [public agency], as an employer in promoting the efficiency of the public services it performs through its employees.” Pickering, 391 *767 U.S. at 568, 88 S.Ct. 1731 ; see Belk v. City of Eldon, 228 F.3d 872, 878 (8th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1008 , 121 S.Ct. 1734 , 149 L.Ed.2d 659 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bluitt v. Houston Independent School District
Johnson v. Moore, 958 F.2d 92, 94 (5th Cir.1992) (quoting Bennett v. City of Slidell, 735 F.2d 861, 862 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1016 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 612 (1985)); accord Brown v. Bryan County, 219 F.3d 450, 462 (5th Cir.2000), ce rt. denied, 532 U.S. 1007 , 121 S.Ct. 1734 , 149 L.Ed.2d 658 (2001); Eugene v. Alief Indep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bluitt v. Houston Independent School Dist.
Johnson v. Moore, 958 F.2d 92, 94 (5th Cir.1992) (quoting Bennett v. City of Slidell, 735 F.2d 861, 862 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1016 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 612 (1985)); accord Brown v. Bryan County, 219 F.3d 450, 462 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1007 , 121 S.Ct. 1734 , 149 L.Ed.2d 658 (2001); Eugene v. Alief Indep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gorman-Bakos v. Cornell Coop, Schenectady Co.
See Belk v. City of Eldon, 228 F.3d 872, 878 (8th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1734 (2001); Shands v. City of Kennett, 993 F.2d 1337, 1342-43 (8th Cir. 1993); cf. Pouillon v. City of Owosso, 206 F.3d 711, 717 (6th Cir. 2000). 45 Accordingly, the judgment is vacated, and the case remanded for further proceedings.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gorman-Bakos v. Cornell Cooperative Extension of Schenectady County
(2×)
See Belk v. City of Eldon, 228 F.3d 872, 878 (8th Cir.2000), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 121 S.Ct. 1734 , 149 L.Ed.2d 659 (2001); Shands v. City of Kennett, 993 F.2d 1337, 1342-43 (8th Cir. 1993); cf. Pouillon v. City of Owosso, 206 F.3d 711, 717 (6th Cir.2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marshall v. Russell
See, e.g., Brown v. Bryan Cnty. , 219 F.3d 450 , 462 (5th Cir. 2000) (affirming denial of motion for judgment as a matter of law on failure to train claim where evidence showed the County provided no training to its officers and had no policies regarding the supervision of junior officers), reh'g denied , 235 F.3d 944 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 532 U.S. 1007 , 121 S.Ct. 1734 , 149 L.Ed.2d 658 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Moore North America, Inc., fka Moore U.S.A., Inc.
v.
Standard Register Co.
v.
Standard Register Co.
No. 00-1346.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 30, 2001.
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.