green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Robinson v. Allstate
See Brown v. City of Oneonta, New York, 221 F.3d 329 , 341 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 816 , 122 S.Ct. 44 , 151 L.Ed.2d 16 (2001); Howell v. Port Chester Police Station, No. 09-CV-1651, 2010 WL 930981 , at *7 (S.D.N.Y.
cited
Cited "see"
Andrea Martin v. State of MO
See Bogren v. Minnesota, 236 F.3d 399, 408-09 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 816 , 122 S.Ct. 44 , 151 L.Ed.2d 16 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Timmons v. City of Hartford
See Brown v. City of Oneonta, 221 F.3d 829 , 339 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 816 , 122 S.Ct. 44 , 151 L.Ed.2d 16 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Farm Labor Organizing Committee v. Ohio State Highway Patrol
See Brown v. City of Oneonta, 221 F.3d 329, 337 (2d Cir.2000) ("[I]t is not necessary to plead the existence of a similarly situated non-minority group when challenging a law or policy that contains an express, racial classification.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 44 , 151 L.Ed.2d 16 (2001); cf. United States v. Ovalle, 136 F.3d 1092, 1104-05 (6th Cir.1998) (holding that it is unnecessary for criminal defendant to establish three-prong test for discrimination in grand jury selection where there is direct evidence of exclusion based upon race).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bazile v. City of New York
See Brown v. City of Oneonta, New York, 221 F.3d 329, 341 , *393 reh’g & reh’g en banc denied, 235 F.3d 769 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 44 , 151 L.Ed.2d 16 (2001); Mian v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Sec.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Awadallah
See Brown v. City of Oneonta, 221 F.3d 329, 340 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 44 , 151 L.Ed.2d 16 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Freeman v. City of Hackensack
See Brown v. City of Oneonta, 221 F.3d 329, 333-334 (2d Cir.2000), rehearing and rehearing en banc denied, 235 F.3d 769 (2000), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 44 , 151 L.Ed.2d 16 (2001) (“We hold that under the circumstances of this case, where law enforcement officials possessed a description of a criminal suspect, even though that description consisted primarily of the suspect’s race and gender, absent other evidence of discriminatory racial animus, they could act on the basis of that description without violating the Equal Protection Clause.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Walker
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 00-1727.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 2001.
Published
Ct. App. Tex., 8th Dist. Certiorari denied.