Beazley v. Cockrell, 534 U.S. 945 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Beazley v. Cockrell, 534 U.S. 945 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
47 citation events (47 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Shell Co., Ltd. v. LOS FRAILES SERVICE STATION (prd, 2008-12-23)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Shell Co., Ltd. v. LOS FRAILES SERVICE STATION
D.P.R. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Procter & Gamble Co. v. Amway Corp., 242 F.3d 539 , 562-64 (5th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 945 , 122 S.Ct. 329 , 151 L.Ed.2d 243 (2001); Conte Bros.
cited Cited "see" State v. Craig
La. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beazley v. Johnson, 242 F.3d 248, 264 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 945 , 122 S.Ct. 329 , 151 L.Ed.2d 243 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Martinez v. Dretke
W.D. Tex. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beazley v. Johnson, 242 F.3d 248, 260 (5th Cir.2001) (holding the same Texas statutory definition of “mitigating evidence” challenged by petitioner herein did not unconstitutionally preclude jury consideration of the mitigating aspects of any evidence of the defendant’s character or background or the circumstances of the offense which the defendant presented at trial), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 945 , 122 S.Ct. 329 , 151 L.Ed.2d 243 (2001); Cordova v. Johnson, 993 F.Supp. 473, 489-98 (W.D.Tex.) (discussing the Supreme Court’s analysis of mitigating evidence), appeal denied, 157 F.3d 38…
discussed Cited "see" Hughes v. Dretke
5th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beazley v. Johnson, 242 F.3d 248, 264 (5th Cir.) (citing Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722 , 735 n. 1, 111 S.Ct. 2546 , 115 L.Ed.2d 640 (1991)) (noting that procedural default occurs when a petitioner fails to exhaust available state remedies and “the court to which the petitioner would be required to present his claims in order to meet the exhaustion requirement would now find the claims procedurally barred”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 945 , 122 S.Ct. 329 , 151 L.Ed.2d 243 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Procter & Gamble Co. v. Haugen
10th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Procter & Gamble v. Amway Corp., 242 F.3d 539 , 545-46 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 945 , 122 S.Ct. 329 , 151 L.Ed.2d 243 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Bright v. Snyder
D. Del. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beazley v. Johnson, 242 F.3d 248, 261 (5th Cir.)(stating that "the proper interpretation of state law is not cognizable in federal habeas proceedings”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 329 , 151 L.Ed.2d 243 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Ford v. NYLCare Health Plans of the Gulf Coast, Inc. (2×)
5th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Procter & Gamble Co. v. Amway Corp., 242 F.3d 539 , 560-62 (5th Cir.) (outlining test for determining prudential Lanham Act standing), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 329 , 151 L.Ed.2d 243 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Prostok v. Browning
Tex. App. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Procter & Gamble Co. v. Amway Corp., 242 F.3d 539 , 546 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 945 , 122 S.Ct. 329 , 151 L.Ed.2d 243 (2001) (district court did not err in giving res judicata effect to prior Utah district court judgment, but because the Utah judgment was later reversed on appeal, the judgment no longer barred the Texas action; the Fifth Circuit reversed res judicata judgment and remanded the ease to the district court).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beazley
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
No. 00-10618.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 2001.
534 U.S. 945
Consideration, Scalia, Souter, Took.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Scalia, Justice Souter, and Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.