green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Josephs
(2×)
See People v. Hall, 194 Ill. 2d 305 , 252 Ill.Dec. 653 , 743 N.E. 2d 521, 536 (2000) (applying Jackson v. Virginia standard in affirming capital murder convictions based on circumstantial evidence, noting that "[c]ircumstantial evidence is sufficient to sustain a criminal conviction, provided that such evidence satisfies proof beyond a reasonable doubt"), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 393 , 151 L.Ed. 2d 297 (2001); Commonwealth v. Begley, 566 Pa. 239 , 780 A. 2d 605, 615-19 (2001) (applying Jackson v. Virginia standard to circumstantial evidence used to convict defendant of first-degre…
cited
Cited "see"
Mazza v. Hall
See Saffold v. Newland, 250 F.3d 1262 (9th Cir.2000), cert. granted sub nom Carey v. Saffold, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 393 , 151 L.Ed.2d 297 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Aubrey v. Attorney General of California
See Saffold v. Newland, 250 F.3d 1262 , 1265 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 393 , 151 L.Ed.2d 297 (Oct. 15, 2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Black v. Clarke
See Saffold v. Newland, 224 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir.2000), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 393 , 151 L.Ed.2d 297 (2001); Welch v. Newland, 267 F.3d 1013 (9th Cir.2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Setala v. J.C. Penney Co.
(2×)
Miller v. Sumner, 872 F.2d 287, 289 (9th Cir.1989); see also Saffold v. Newland, 250 F.3d 1262, 1268-69 (9th Cir.2000) (remanding case to district court for a determination of when prisoner delivered petition to state prison authorities for mailing, because prisoner maintained he delivered petition to authorities fourteen days prior to filing stamp), cert. granted, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 393 , 151 L.Ed.2d 297 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donovan v. State of Maine
Compare Adams v. LeMaster, 223 F.3d 1177, 1181 (10th Cir.2000) (concluding that state law governs and, thus, that the prisoner mailbox rule ought not to be applied to a state-court petition for post-conviction relief when determin *91 ing tolling under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (d)(2)), with Saffold v. Newland, 250 F.3d 1262, 1268-69 (9th Cir.2001) (holding to the contrary), ce rt. granted, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 393 , 151 L.Ed.2d 297 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc.
v.
Village of Stratton
v.
Village of Stratton
No. 00-1737.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 2001.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Question 2 presented by the petition.