green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2002 · 2 courts ·
…we conclude that this court's heightened pleading requirement cannot survive crawford-el.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Galbraith v. County of Santa Clara
we conclude that this court's heightened pleading requirement cannot survive crawfordr-el.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Galbraith v. County Of Santa Clara
we conclude that this court's heightened pleading requirement cannot survive crawford-el.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carlos D. Goad and Robert J. Wuchich v. Betty Mitchell, Jacqui Visintine, and M.A. Gilbert
we conclude that this court's heightened pleading requirement cannot survive crawford-el.
cited
Cited "see"
Butler v. Rio Rancho Public Schools Board of Education
See Currier v. Doran, 242 F.3d 905, 911 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1019 , 122 S.Ct. 543 , 151 L.Ed.2d 421 (2001); Tonkovich v. Kansas Bd. of Regents, 159 F.3d 504 , 516 (10th Cir.1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Uberoi v. City of Boulder
See Harrison v. Eddy Potash, Inc., 248 F.3d 1014, 1022 (10th Cir.) (setting forth elements of collateral estoppel), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1019 , 122 S.Ct. 543 , 151 L.Ed.2d 421 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Bell v. Manspeaker
See Currier v. Doran, 242 F.3d 905, 916 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. - , 122 S.Ct. 543 , 151 L.Ed.2d 421 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Barber
See Currier v. Doran, 242 F.3d 905 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 543 , 151 L.Ed.2d 421 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dexter v. Ford Motor Company
Sutton v. Utah State Sch. for Deaf & Blind, 173 F.3d 1226, 1236 (10th Cir.1999); see also Currier v. Doran, 242 F.3d 905, 911 (10th Cir.) (standard of review of a 12(b)(6) dismissal on grounds of qualified immunity is de novo), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1019 , 122 S.Ct. 543 , 151 L.Ed.2d 421 (2001). “[A]ll well-pleaded factual allegations in the amended complaint are accepted as true and viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” Sutton, 173 F.3d at 1236 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grimes
v.
City of St. Joseph
v.
City of St. Joseph
No. 01-374.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 2001.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2) · Sixth Circuit (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.