Hollowell v. Cockrell, 534 U.S. 1116 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Hollowell v. Cockrell, 534 U.S. 1116 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re Gillenwater (vawb, 2012-09-18)
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" In re Gillenwater
Bankr. W.D. Va. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tavenner v. Smoot (In re Smoot), 257 F.3d 401 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1116 , 122 S.Ct. 926 , 151 L.Ed.2d 890 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Rizzo (2×)
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Whitehead v. Cowan, 263 F.3d 708, 732 (7th Cir.2001) (noting that Illinois courts previously have reached that conclusion, and also have declined to require that defendant be informed that jury's decision to impose death penalty must be unanimous), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1116 , 122 S.Ct. 927 , 151 L.Ed.2d 890 (2002); see also People v. Shatner, 174 Ill.2d 133, 154 , 220 Ill.Dec. 346 , 673 N.E.2d 258 (1996) (Illinois courts repeatedly have held that defendant need not be expressly advised that vote of single juror may preclude imposition of death penalty).
discussed Cited "see" Sullivan v. Welsh (In Re Lumbar)
8th Cir. BAP · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tavenner v. Smoot, 257 F.3d 401, 406 (4th Cir.2001) (noting that a majority of courts have rejected the “no harm, no foul” approach for avoiding fraudulent transfers), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1116 , 122 S.Ct. 926 , 151 L.Ed.2d, 890 (2002); Fox v. Smoker (In re Noblit), 72 F.3d 757, 758 (9th Cir.1995) (stating that the majority of recent cases has rejected the "diminution of the estate” doctrine) (citing In re Richards, 92 B.R. 369, 372 (Bankr.N.D.Ind.1988); In re Rundlett, 149 B.R. 353, 358 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1993); Matter of Wickstrom, 113 B.R. 339, 351 (Bankr.W.D.Mich.1990); In re Cates…
cited Cited "see" In Re Godfrey
Bankr. D. Utah · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tavenner v. Smoot, 257 F.3d 401 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1116 , 122 S.Ct. 926 , 151 L.Ed.2d 890 (2002).
cited Cited "see" In re Conley
Bankr. W.D. Va. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tavenner v. Smoot (In re Smoot), 257 F.3d 401 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1116 , 122 S.Ct. 926 , 151 L.Ed.2d 890 .
cited Cited "see" Robledo-Gonzales v. Ashcroft, John D.
7th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Whitehead v. Cowan, 263 F.3d 708 , 730 n. 5 (7th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1116 , 122 S.Ct. 927 , 151 L.Ed.2d 890 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Robledo-Gonzales v. Ashcroft
7th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Whitehead v. Cowan, 263 F.3d 708 , 730 n. 5 (7th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1116 , 122 S.Ct. 927 , 151 L.Ed.2d 890 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Hicks
Bankr. W.D. Mo. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Tavenner v. Smoot (In re Smoot), 265 B.R. 128, 141-42 (Bankr.E.D.Va. 1999), aff'd 257 F.3d 401 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied 534 U.S. 1116 , 122 S.Ct. 926 , 151 L.Ed.2d 890 (2002) (holding that § 522(g) provides the conditions under which the debt- or may exempt property that the trustee recovers under §§ 544 and 550). 5 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hollowell
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
No. 01-7066.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 2002.
534 U.S. 1116
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.