green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Barnes
See United States v. Alanis, 265 F.3d 576, 592 (7th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1095 , 122 S. Ct. 2289 , 152 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Baker v. John Morrell & Co.
(2×)
See United States v. Dico, Inc., 266 F.3d 864, 871 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1095 , 122 S.Ct. 2291 , 152 L.Ed.2d 1050 (2002), (citing Hose, 70 F.3d at 974) (stating that sufficiency of factual basis of expert testimony goes to credibility, not admissibility, unless expert’s opinion “is ‘so fundamentally unsupported that it can offer no assistance to the jury’ ”) (quoting Loudermill v. Dow Chem.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jimmie Lee Riley v. David T. Kurtz
(2×)
See Johnson v. Daley, 339 F.3d 582, 585 (7th Cir.2003) (en banc), petition for cert. filed, 72 U.S.L.W. 3373 (U.S. Nov. 17, 2003); see also Walker v. Bain, 257 F.3d 660, 667 (6th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1095 , 122 S.Ct. 2291 , 152 L.Ed.2d 1050 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Loutos
See also United States v. Bjorkman, 270 F.3d 482, 496-97 (7th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1095 , 122 S.Ct. 2290 , 152 L.Ed.2d 1049 (2002) (favorably citing cases that base relevant conduct on offenses that occurred after the offense of conviction).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dico, Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
01-1223.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 28, 2002.
Published
DICO, INC.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 01-1223.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 28, 2002.
1
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 266 F. 3d 864.