green
Positive treatment
3.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Orona-Rangal v. State
Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶25 , 33 P.3d 758, ¶25 (Wyo.2001), cert denied, - U.S. -, 122 8.Ct. 1554, 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002) (some citations omitted). [111] To determine whether the trial court erred by allowing evidence of Ms. Moon's pregnancy at the time of the accident, we must inquire as to whether the evidence was relevant to the charges and, if it was relevant, whether its possible prejudicial effect on the jury outweighed its probative value.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. State
See also Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶ 25 , 33 P.3d 758, 766-67 (Wyo.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 994 , 122 S.Ct. 1554 , 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002). [¶ 20] Reed's testimony only encompassed whether the appellant executed the credit card documents at issue.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lopez v. State
To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under 'cireum-stances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice, or conduct which offends the public sense of fair play." Johnson v. State, 790 P.2d 231, 232 (Wyo.1990)." *150 Solis [v. State], 981 P.2d [34] at 36 [(Wyo.1999)] (some citations omitted); see also Ryan v. State, 988 P.2d 46, 52-53 (Wyo.1999)." Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶ 25 , 33 P.3d 758, 766-67 (Wyo.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 994 , 122 S.Ct. 1554 , 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seward v. State
To demonstrate harmful error, the defendant must show prejudice under 'cireumstances which manifest inherent unfairness and injustice, or conduct which offends the public sense of fair play.' Johnson v. State, 790 P.2d 231, 232 (Wyo.1990)." Solis [v. State], 981 P.2d [34] at 36 [ (Wyo.1999)] (some citations omitted); see also Ryan v. State, 988 P.2d 46, 52-53 (Wyo.1999)." Skinner v. State, 2001 WY 102, ¶ 25 , 33 P.3d 758, 766-67 (Wyo.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 994 , 122 S.Ct. 1554 , 152 L.Ed.2d 477 (2002). 4 *811 APPELLANT's W.R.E. 801(D)(1)(B) Arcu-MENTS [T 14] We recognize that the State…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Earls
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
v.
Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
01-8145.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 2002.
Published
EARLS
v.
COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION.
No. 01-8145.
Supreme Court of the United States.
April 15, 2002.
1
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.