green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Galarza
See Commonwealth v. Vuthy Seng , 436 Mass. 537 , 550, 766 N.E.2d 492 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 942 , 123 S.Ct. 342 , 154 L.Ed.2d 249 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Henry v. State
The functional equivalent of interrogation “refers not only to express questioning, but also to any words or actions on the part of the police (other than those normally attendant to arrest and custody) that the police should know are reason *531 ably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.” Rhode Island v. Innis, 446 U.S. 291, 301 , 100 S.Ct. 1682 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297 (1980) (footnotes omitted); see Drury v. State, 368 Md. 331, 337 , 793 A.2d 567 (functional equivalent of interrogation occurred when, before being given his Miranda warnings, the defendant was placed in an …
discussed
Cited "see"
Marcus C. Sanders v. A.A. Lamarque, Warden
(2×)
See Benn v. Lambert, 283 F.3d 1040, 1051 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 942 , 123 S.Ct. 341 , 154 L.Ed.2d 249 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
Ross v. Garcia
See Benn v. Lambert, 283 F.3d 1040, 1051 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 942 , 128 S.Ct. 341 , 154 L.Ed.2d 249 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Homestake Lead Co. of Missouri v. Doe Run Resources Corp.
See Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc. v. United Ass’n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipefitting Indus., Local 38, 282 F.3d 746 , 752 n. 6 (9th Cir.2002) (noting the pitfalls but confirming that the court “may look to substantive provisions insofar as it is necessary to consider exclusions to an arbitration clause”) (internal quotations omitted), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 942 , 123 S.Ct. 342 , 154 L.Ed.2d 249 (2002).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Buckley
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Vuthy Seng , 436 Mass. 537 , 550-555, 766 N.E.2d 492 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 942 , 123 S.Ct. 342 , 154 L.Ed.2d 249 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cooper v. State
Moreover, he was subjected at this time to interrogation or, at the least, “its functional equivalent.” See Innis, 446 U.S. at 301 , 100 S.Ct. 1682 (“[T]he term ‘interrogation’ under Miranda refers not only to express questioning, but also to any words or actions on the part of the police (other than those normally attendant to arrest and custody) that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect.”) (footnotes omitted); see also Drury v. State, 368 Md. 331 , 793 A.2d 567 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 942 , 123 S.Ct. 341 , 154 L.Ed.2d …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lambert, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary
v.
Benn
v.
Benn
01-1755.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.