green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Jordaan v. Hall
See Bank One, N.A v. Shumake, 281 F.3d 507, 513 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 818 , 123 S.Ct. 94 , 154 L.Ed.2d 25 (2002); Rio Grande Underwriters, Inc. v. Pitts Farms, Inc., 276 F.3d 683, 685 (5th Cir.2001); Commercial Metals Company v. Balfour, Guthrie, and Company, 577 F.2d 264, 268-69 (5th *790 Cir.1978); see also Whiteside v. Teltech Corporation, 940 F.2d 99 , 102 (4th Cir.1991); Robert Lawrence Company v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc., 271 F.2d 402, 408-09 (2d Cir.1959), cert. granted, 362 U.S. 909 , 80 S.Ct. 682 , 4 L.Ed.2d 618 (1960), cert. dismissed, 364 U.S. 801 , 81 S.Ct. 27 , 5 L.Ed…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mullin v. Guidant Corp.
See, e.g., Cox Cable Advisory Council v. Dept. of Public Utility Control, 259 Conn. 56, 70-71 , 788 A.2d 29 (addressing express preemption provision in federal Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. § 521 et seq., as it relates to section in same act specifically setting forth jurisdiction of state courts), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 819 , 123 S. Ct. 95 , 154 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cox Cable Advisory Council
v.
Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control
v.
Connecticut Department of Public Utility Control
01-1738.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
Published
COX CABLE ADVISORY COUNCIL
v.
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITY CONTROL ET AL.
No. 01-1738.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 7, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CONNECTICUT.
2
Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 259 Conn. 56, 788 A. 2d 29.