green
Positive treatment
1.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. United States
See Bay View, Inc. v. United States, 278 F.3d 1259, 1262 (Fed.Cir.2001), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 826 , 123 S.Ct. 114 , 154 L.Ed.2d 37 (2002); Seldovia Native Assoc. v. United States, 144 F.3d 769, 771 (Fed.Cir.1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank W. Smith Janice M. Smith v. United States
See Daugette v. Patterson, 250 F.2d 753, 755-57 (5th Cir.1957); see also, e.g., Ihnen v. United States, 272 F.3d 577, 579-81 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 114 , 154 L.Ed.2d 37 (2002); Aronsohn v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, 988 F.2d 454, 456-57 (3d Cir.1993); Union Pac.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Folden v. United States
An implied-in-fact contract is an agreement “ ‘founded upon a meeting of minds, which, although not embodied in an express contract, is inferred, as a fact, from conduct of the parties showing, in the light of the surrounding circumstances their tacit understanding.’ ” Trauma Serv., Group v. United States, 104 F.3d at 1326 (quoting Hercules, Inc. v. United States, 516 U.S. 417, 424 , 116 S.Ct. 981 , 134 L.Ed.2d 47 (1996)) (quoting Baltimore & Ohio R.R. v. United States, 261 U.S. 592, 597 , 58 Ct.Cl. 709 , 43 S.Ct. 425 , 67 L.Ed. 816 (1923)); see also Bay View, Inc. v. United States, 27…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bailey v. United States
Group v. United States, 104 F.3d at 1326 (quoting Hercules, Inc. v. United States, 516 U.S. 417, 424 , 116 S.Ct. 981 , 134 L.Ed.2d 47 (1996)) (quoting Baltimore & Ohio R.R. v. United States, 261 U.S. 592, 597 , 58 Ct.Cl. 709 , 43 S.Ct. 425 , 67 L.Ed. 816 (1923)); see also Bay View, Inc. v. United States, 278 F.3d 1259, 1265-66 (Fed.Cir.2001) (citing Trauma Service Group v. United States, 104 F.3d at 1326), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 285 F.3d 1035 , cert. denied, — U.S. —, 123 S.Ct. 114 , 154 L.Ed.2d 37 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sveriges Angfartygs Assurans Forening, Dba the Swedish Club
v.
Glovegold Shipping Ltd
v.
Glovegold Shipping Ltd
01-1861.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
Published
SVERIGES ANGFARTYGS ASSURANS FORENING, DBA THE SWEDISH CLUB
v.
GLOVEGOLD SHIPPING LTD.
No. 01-1861.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 7, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT.
2
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 791 So. 2d 4.