Rasten v. Norfolk Cnty., Massachusetts, 537 U.S. 1070 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Rasten v. Norfolk Cnty., Massachusetts, 537 U.S. 1070 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
83 citation events (83 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hannon v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (flmd, 2007-10-23)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hannon v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
M.D. Fla. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1070 , 123 S.Ct. 662 , 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002); King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1067 , 123 S.Ct. 657 , 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002); Kormondy v. State, 845 So.2d 41, 54 (Fla.2003) (Ring does not encompass Florida procedures or require either notice of the aggravating factors that the State will present at sentencing or a special verdict form indicating the aggravating factors found by the jury).
discussed Cited "see" Taylor v. State
Fla. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at 74 (citing Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1070 , 123 S.Ct. 662 , 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002), and King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1067 , 123 S.Ct. 657 , 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002)).
discussed Cited "see" FLORIDA DEPT. OF FINANCIAL SERV. v. Freeman
Fla. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693, 695 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1070 , 123 S.Ct. 662 , 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002); King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143, 144 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1067 , 123 S.Ct. 657 , 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" German L. Matthews v. R. James Nicholson
Vet. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
The letter also “expressed] dissatisfaction or disagreement with an adjudicative determination by the [RO] and a desire to contest the result” and was “in terms which can be reasonably construed as disagreement with that determination and a desire for appellate review.” 38 C.F.R. § 20.201 (1999); see Gallegos v. Principi, 283 F.3d 1309 (Fed.Cir.2002) cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1071 , 123 S.Ct. 687 , 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. State
Fla. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1070 , 123 S.Ct. 662 , 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002); King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1067 , 123 S.Ct. 657 , 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Merritt I. Anderson v. Anthony J. Principi
Vet. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
An NOD is defined by regulation as “[a] written communication from a claimant or his or her representative expressing dissatisfaction or disagreement with an adjudicative determination by the [RO] and a desire to contest the result” and it “must be in terms which can be reasonably construed as disagreement with that determination and a desire for appellate review.” 38 C.F.R. § 20.201 (2003); see Gallegos v. Principi, 283 F.3d 1309 (Fed.Cir.2002) cer t. denied, 537 U.S. 1071 , 123 S.Ct. 687 , 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Kimbrough v. State
Fla. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1070 , 123 S.Ct. 662 , 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002); King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1067 , 123 S.Ct. 657 , 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Windom v. State
Fla. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693, 695 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1070 , 123 S.Ct. 662 , 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002); King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1067 , 123 S.Ct. 657 , 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Guzman v. State
Fla. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693, 695 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1070 , 123 S.Ct. 662 , 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Cummings-El v. State
Fla. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1070 , 123 S.Ct. 662 , 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002); King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1067 , 123 S.Ct. 657 , 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Owen v. Crosby
Fla. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla.), cert denied, 537 U.S. 1070 , 123 S.Ct. 662 , 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Pace v. State
Fla. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1070 , 123 S.Ct. 662 , 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002); King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1067 , 123 S.Ct. 657 , 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002).
cited Cited "see" Banks v. State
Fla. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 662 , 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Hernandez-Alberto v. State
Fla. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1070 , 123 S.Ct. 662 , 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kormondy v. State
Fla. · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Bottoson v. Moore, 833 So.2d 693 (Fla. 2002), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 662 , 154 L.Ed.2d 564 (2002); King v. Moore, 831 So.2d 143 (Fla.2002), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 657 , 154 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rasten
v.
Norfolk County, Massachusetts
02-5795.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 2002.
537 U.S. 1070
Published

C. A. 1st Cir. Motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed informa pauperis [ante, p. 945] denied.