Jones v. Texas Bd. of Crim. Just., 537 U.S. 1236 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Jones v. Texas Bd. of Crim. Just., 537 U.S. 1236 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 4 distinct cases · "[A]ny invocation of equity to relieve the strict application of a statute of limitations must be guarded and infrequent, lest circumstances of individualized hardship supplant the rules of clearly drafted statutes."
60 citation events (60 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Flow v. Sheriff Columbia County, Arkansas (arwd, 2018-03-08)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Flow v. Sheriff Columbia County, Arkansas
W.D. Ark. · 2018 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
ny invocation of equity to relieve the strict application of a statute of limitations must be guarded and infrequent, lest circumstances of individualized hardship supplant the rules of clearly drafted statutes.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Commonwealth v. Wallace
Mass. App. Ct. · 2014 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
doggett establishes that, when the pretrial delay is grossly excessive, the fourth barker factor can tilt in the defendant's favor even though no showing of actual prejudice has been made
cited Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Butler
Mass. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rashad v. Walsh, 300 F.3d 27, 35-36 (1st Cir. 2002), cert, denied 537 U.S. 1236 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Quincy Paul Jones v. State
Tex. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rashad v. Walsh, 300 F.3d 27, 34 (1st Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1236 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Quincy Paul Jones v. State
Tex. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rashad v. Walsh , 300 F.3d 27, 34 (1st Cir. 2002), cert. denied , 537 U.S. 1236 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thomas v. Salazar (2×)
C.D. Cal. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cf., e.g., Malcom v. Payne, 281 F.3d 951, 957-62 (9th Cir.2002) (petition for clemency-under Washington state law is not an application for “state post-conviction or other collateral review” and therefore does not toll the statute); see also Moore v. Cain, 298 F.3d 361, 366-67 (5th Cir.2002) (state court mandamus application requesting trial court be directed to rule on state habeas application is not application for collateral review with respect to prisoner’s conviction, and does not toll one-year limitation period), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1236 , 123 S.Ct. 1360 , 155 L.Ed.2d 202 (2003)…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jones
v.
Texas Board of Criminal Justice
02-8239.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 2003.
537 U.S. 1236
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: #44,161 of 633,719
Citer courts: W.D. Arkansas (1) · Massachusetts Appeals Court (1)

537 U.S. 1236

JONES
v.
TEXAS BOARD OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ET AL.

No. 02-8239.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 3, 2003.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.