Ageloff v. United States, 540 U.S. 939 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Ageloff v. United States, 540 U.S. 939 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Rafat Zakhary, A/K/A \Rezk Mekhaeil
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Rafat Zakhary, A/K/A \Rezk Mekhaeil
unknown court · 2004 · signal: accord · confidence high
Mindful that this court has previously held that a failure to determine losses within the § 3664(d)(5) time period will be deemed harmless error unless a defendant can show actual prejudice from the delay, see United States v. Stevens, 211 F.3d 1, 5 (2d Cir.2000); accord United States v. Catoggio, 326 F.3d 323, 329-330 (2d Cir.), cert. denied , — - U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 264 , 157 L.Ed.2d 252 (2003), Zakhary urges us to limit this rule to cases where the defendant contributes or consents to the delay.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ageloff
v.
United States
03-78.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
540 U.S. 939
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of petitioner to defer consideration of petition for writ of[*940] certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.