green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
12.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, 2009–2014 ·
…he doctrine may be entertained only in extraordinary circumstances
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Spivery-Jones v. Receivership Estate of Trans Healthcare, Inc.
he doctrine may be entertained only in extraordinary circumstances
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Addison v. Lochearn Nursing Home, LLC
he doctrine may be entertained only in extraordinary circumstances
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Bowen
he doctrine may be entertained only in extraordinary circumstances
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nicastro v. McIntyre MacHinery America, Ltd.
See, e.g., Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Still N the Water Publ'g, 327 F.3d 472, 479-80 (6th Cir.) (expressing "preference” for Justice O’Connor’s approach and applying it to case), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 948 , 124 S.Ct. 399 , 157 L.Ed.2d 279 (2003); Lesnick v. Hollingsworth & Vose Co., 35 F.3d 939, 944-46 (4th Cir.1994) (taking approach similar to that of Justice O’Connor), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1151 , 115 S.Ct. 1103 , 130 L.Ed.2d 1070 (1995); Boit v. Gar-Tec Prods., Inc., 967 F.2d 671, 681-83 (1st Cir. 1992) (same); Madara v. Hall, 916 F.2d 1510, 1519 (11th Cir. 1990) (same); Sorrells v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Copeland Corp. v. Choice Fabricators, Inc.
See also, Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Still N The Water Publishing, 327 F.3d 472, 478 (6th Cir.) (“Dismissal [when an evidentiary hearing has not been held] is proper only if all the specific facts which the plaintiff ... alleges collectively fail to state a prima facie case for jurisdiction”) (internal quotation marks and cita *787 tions omitted), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 948 , 124 S.Ct. 399 , 157 L.Ed.2d 279 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Holley-Adkins v. Holley
See also, Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Still N The Water Publishing, 327 F.3d 472, 478 (6th Cir.) (“Dismissal [when an evidentiary hearing has not been held] is proper only if all the specific facts which the plaintiff ... alleges collectively fail to state a prima facie case for jurisdiction”) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 948 , 124 S.Ct. 399 , 157 L.Ed.2d 279 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Headwaters Inc., an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation Forest Conservation Council v. U.S. Forest Service
(2×)
Arizona v. California, 530 U.S. 392, 414 , 120 S.Ct. 2304 , 147 L.Ed.2d 374 (2000) (first alteration in original); see also Gospel Missions of Am. v. City of Los Angeles, 328 F.3d 548 , 553 (9th Cir.2003), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 398 , 157 L.Ed.2d 279 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gospel Missions of America
v.
City of Los Angeles, California
v.
City of Los Angeles, California
03-208.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 2003.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (3)
GOSPEL MISSIONS OF AMERICA ET AL.
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
No. 03-208.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 14, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 9th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 328 F. 3d 548.