Bryant v. Aiken Reg'l Med. Centers, Inc., 540 U.S. 1106 (2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Bryant v. Aiken Reg'l Med. Centers, Inc., 540 U.S. 1106 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events (33 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. Universal Security Instruments, Inc. (mdd, 2006-01-18)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Leviton Manufacturing Co. v. Universal Security Instruments, Inc.
D. Maryland · 2006 · confidence medium
Rather, USI has relied principally on an allegedly “clarifying” decision of the Fourth Circuit, International Bancorp, LLC v. Societe des Bains de Mer et du Cercle des Estrangers a Monaco, 329 F.3d 359 (4th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1106 , 124, S.Ct. 1052, 157 L.Ed.2d 891 (2004), that it says tilts the record for -summary judgment in its favor.
cited Cited "see" Dean v. Pacific Bellwether, LLC
N. Mar. I. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Int’l Bancorp, LLC v. Societe des Bains de Mer et du Cercle des Estrangers a Monaco, 329 F.3d 359 , 363 (4th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1106 , 124 S.Ct. 1052 , 157 L.Ed.2d 891 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Leotha Barrow, Also Known as \Petey\"
unknown court · 2005 · signal: accord · confidence high
If we conclude that the proffer agreement waiver does apply in this case, our second step is to review for abuse of discretion the district court’s evidentiary rulings admitting particular parts of Johnson’s proffer statements, see Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172 , 174 n. 1, 117 S.Ct. 644 , 136 L,Ed.2d 574 (1997); accord United States v. Schultz, 333 F.3d 393, 415 (2d Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1106 , 124 S.Ct. 1051 , 157 L.Ed.2d 891 (2004), and we will not reverse unless an error affects a “substantial right,” Fed.R.Evid. 103(a).
discussed Cited "see" Adventis, Inc. v. Consolidated Property Holdings, Inc.
4th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Int’l Bancorp, LLC v. Societe des Bains de Mer et du Cercle des Etrangers a Monaco, 329 F.3d 359, 362-63 (4th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1106 , 124 S.Ct. 1052 , 157 L.Ed.2d 891 (2004). 3 In their briefs and at oral argument, both parties asserted that the district court erred in disregarding their admissions regarding likelihood of confusion and that they were entitled to a finding that the other party had infringed on their marks.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Surdow
2d Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Schultz, 333 F.3d 393, 415 (2d Cir.2003) (quoting Old Chief v. United States, 519 U.S. 172 , 174 n. 1, 117 S.Ct. 644 , 136 L.Ed.2d 574 (1997)), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1106 , 124 S.Ct. 1051 , 157 L.Ed.2d 891 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. U.S. Gas & Electric, Inc.
W.D.N.Y. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., International Bancorp, LLC v. Societe des Bains de Mer et du Cercle des Estrangers a Monaco, 329 F.3d 359 , 370 (4th Cir.2003) (district court did not err in finding that company had shown that its mark had achieved secondary meaning, based in part on evidence of “a long history of continuous, if not exclusive, use of the mark”), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1106 , 124 S.Ct. 1052 , 157 L.Ed.2d 891 (2004); Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Panduit Corp., 138 F.3d 277, 295 (7th Cir.1998) (“An additional factor that is important in determining secondary meaning ... is the time, if any, that T & …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bryant
v.
Aiken Regional Medical Centers, Inc.
No. 03-587.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 12, 2004.
540 U.S. 1106
Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.