green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services
(2×)
See In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340, 352-54 (Tex.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 , 124 S.Ct. 1674 , 158 L.Ed.2d 371 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Astoria Industries of Iowa, Inc. v. SNF, Inc.
See 113 S.W.3d 340 , 349 (Tex.2003) (holding that an appellate court generally will decide constitutional questions only when it cannot resolve issues on nonconstitutional grounds), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 , 124 S.Ct. 1674 , 158 L.Ed.2d 371 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re DW
P. 33.1(a). [7] Bushell v. Dean, 803 S.W.2d 711, 712 (Tex. 1991) (op. on reh'g). [8] In re Doe 2, 19 S.W.3d 278, 284 (Tex.2000) (holding facial constitutional challenge based on Separation of Powers Clause not properly considered on appeal where not raised in trial court); see In re R.B., 225 S.W.3d 798, 802 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2007, no pet.) (holding constitutional challenge based on facial invalidity of statute in parental termination case waived when not raised in trial court); see also In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340, 354-55 (Tex.2003) (holding courts of appeals must not retreat from error p…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., Children
In re Doe 2, 19 S.W.3d 278, 284 (Tex.2000) (holding facial constitutional challenge based on Separation of Powers Clause not properly considered on appeal where not raised in trial court); see In re R.B., 225 S.W.3d 798, 802 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2007, no pet.) (holding constitutional challenge based on facial invalidity of statute in parental termination case waived when not raised in trial court); see also In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340, 354-55 (Tex.2003) (holding courts of appeals must not retreat from error preservation standards to review unpreserved error in parental rights termination case…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Cerberus Capital Management, L.P.
Id.; see also In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340 , 346 n. 5 (Tex.2003) (discussing waiver for joint representation), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 , 124 S.Ct. 1674 , 158 L.Ed.2d 371 (2004). 12 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McMahon
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
03-8418.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 2004.
Published
McMAHON
v.
DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION.
No. 03-8418.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 22, 2004.
1
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.