green
Positive treatment
Trending · 97 recent citers
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.7 score
“a central disagreement between and epa is whether 'routine' should be defined relative to an industrial category or to a particular unit.”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Alabama Power Co.
a central disagreement between and epa is whether 'routine' should be defined relative to an industrial category or to a particular unit.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
John Doe v. the Catholic Diocese of El Paso and Msgr. Thomas Rowland
Id. at 751.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Cook v. Nacogdoches Anesthesia Group, L.L.P.
(2×)
Id. at 750-51.
cited
Cited "see"
Ross Mandel and Lea Mandel v. Lewisville Independent School District, County of Denton, City of Plano, and Claussner Holdings, LLC
See King Ranch, Inc. v. Chapman, 118 S.W.3d 742, 751 (Tex.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1030 , 124 S.Ct. 2097 , 158 L.Ed.2d 711 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
in the Interest of a Child
See King Ranch, Inc. v. Chapman, 118 S.W.3d 742, 751 (Tex. 2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1030 , 124 S.Ct. 2097 , 158 L.Ed.2d 711 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Barry Nussbaum v. Builders Bank, an Illinois Banking Corporation
See King Ranch, Inc. v. Chapman, 118 S.W.3d 742, 751 (Tex.2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 1030 , 124 S.Ct. 2097 , 158 L.Ed.2d 711 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carr v. City of Cisco
See, e.g., King Ranch, Inc. v. Chapman, 118 S.W.3d 742, 756-57 (Tex.2003), cert, den’d, 541 U.S. 1030 , 124 S.Ct. 2097 , 158 L.Ed.2d 711 (2004)(upholding summary judgment where adverse possession by limitations was established as a matter of law).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gibson v. Dynegy Midstream Services, L.P.
Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 16.021(1) (Vernon 2002); see also King Ranch, Inc. v. Chapman, 118 S.W.3d 742, 756 (Tex.2003), cert, denied, - U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2097 , 158 L.Ed.2d 711 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leavitt, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
v.
Tennessee Valley Authority
v.
Tennessee Valley Authority
03-1162.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 3, 2004.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: N.D. Alabama (1)
LEAVITT, ADMINISTRATOR, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL.
v.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY ET AL.
No. 03-1162.
Supreme Court of United States.
May 3, 2004.
1
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 336 F. 3d 1236.