green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Liu v. Credit Suisse First Boston Corp.
But see Broudo v. Dura Pharms., Inc., 339 F.3d 933, 938 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that plaintiffs need only allege that they bought securities at artificially inflated prices to allege loss causation), cert. granted by Dura Pharms., Inc. v. Broudo, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 2904 , 159 L.Ed.2d 811 (2004). .
discussed
Cited "but see"
In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Lit.
But see Broudo v. Dura Pharms., Inc., 339 F.3d 933, 938 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that plaintiffs need only allege that they bought securities at artificially inflated prices to allege loss causation), cert. granted by Dura Pharms., Inc. v. Broudo, 542 U.S. 936 , 124 S.Ct. 2904 , 159 L.Ed.2d 811 (2004). [63] Lentell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 396 F.3d 161, 173 (2d Cir.2005) (emphasis in original) (quoting Suez Equity, 250 F.3d at 95 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Raich v. Gonzales
(2×)
See Ashcroft v. Raich, 542 U.S. 936 , 124 S.Ct. 2909 , 159 L.Ed.2d 811 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stanley Williams v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
(2×)
See Miller-El v. Dretke, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2908 , 159 L.Ed.2d 811 (2004) (NO. 03-9659). .
cited
Cited "see"
Mobassa Boyd v. Anthony C. Newland, Warden
See Miller-El v. Dretke, - U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2908 , 159 L.Ed.2d 811 (2004) (granting petition for certiorari). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Steven G. Slutzker in No. 03-4219 v. Philip Johnson Gerald J. Pappert Stephen A. Zappala, Jr., District Attorney, Allegheny County, Pa, in No. 03-4046
See Rhines v. Weber, 346 F.3d 799 (8th Cir.2003), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2905 , 159 L.Ed.2d 811 (2004); cf. Pliler v. Ford, - U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2441, 2446 , 159 L.Ed.2d 338 (2004) (declining to "address!] the propriety of [the] stay-and-abeyance procedure”). 12 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Swack v. Credit Suisse First Boston
See, e.g., Broudo v. Dura Pharms., Inc., 339 F.3d 933 , 938-39 (9th Cir.2003), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 2904 , 159 L.Ed.2d 811 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tenet, Individually and as Director of Central Intelligence and Director of the Central Intelligence Agency
v.
Doe Et Ux
v.
Doe Et Ux
03-1395.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 2004.
Published
TENET, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AND DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ET AL.
v.
DOE ET UX.
No. 03-1395.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 28, 2004.
1
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted. Reported below: 329 F. 3d 1135.