green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.
But see, e. g., United States v. Pennsylvania Refuse Removal Ass’n, 242 F.Supp. 794, 798 (E.D.Pa.1965), aff’d, 357 F.2d 806 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 961 , 86 S.Ct. 1588 , 16 L.Ed.2d 674 (1966); United States v. Green, 143 F.Supp. 442, 445 (S.D.Ill.1956), aff’d, 246 F.2d 155 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 355 U.S. 871 , 78 S.Ct. 122 , 2 L.Ed.2d 76 (1957). 3 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
David Matthew Lathers v. United States
Westover v. United States, 1966, 384 U.S. 436, 494-497 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 674, 735-736 (included in the Miranda opinion). 8 66 Because the Miranda guidelines apply only to criminal trials commencing after June 13, 1966, 9 appellant reaction to those guidelines has been slow in coming.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Cruz
See State v. Athorn, 46 N.J. 247, 251-52 , 216 A.2d 369 , cert. denied, 384 U.S. 962 , 86 S.Ct. 1589 , 16 L.Ed. 2d 674 (1966) (upholding jury verdict because juror’s statements, during deliberations, that “cops take bribes” demonstrated a shared experience rather than bias against a defendant police officer). [Id. at 368-369, 727 A.2d 468 .] Here, we know the juror had an opinion about the police stopping motorists but such an opinion did not go to the heart of the State’s case and there was no indication that her opinion had been shared with other jurors.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Adams
See State v. Athorn, 46 N.J. 247, 251-52 , 216 A. 2d 369 , cert. denied, 384 U.S. 962 , 86 S.Ct. 1589 , 16 L.Ed. 2d 674 (1966) (upholding jury verdict because juror's statements, during deliberations, that "cops take bribes" demonstrated a shared experience rather than bias against a defendant police officer).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hernandez
See Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 678-79 , 106 S.Ct. 1431, 1434-35 , 89 *16 L.Ed.2d 674 (1986); United States v. Rivera-Santiago, 872 F.2d 1073, 1084 (1st Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Shomo
See State v. Koedatich, 112 N.J. 225, 288 , 548 A. 2d 939 (1988) (holding that verdict may be challenged only on manifestation of racial or religious bigotry or if juror discussed aspects of case based on personal knowledge not in evidence), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1017 , 109 S.Ct. 813 , 102 L.Ed.2d 803 (1989); accord State v. Athom, 46 N.J. 247, 251-52 , 216 A.2d 369 , cert. denied, 384 U.S. 962 , 86 S.Ct. 1589 , 16 L.Ed.2d 674 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
See State v. Athorn, 46 N.J. 247, 253 (1966), cert. den., 384 U.S. 962 , 86 S.Ct. 1589 , 16 L.Ed. 2d 674 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Allied Asphalt Paving Co.
See United States v. Pennsylvania Refuse Removal Association, 357 F.2d 806 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 961 , 86 S.Ct. 1588 , 16 L.Ed.2d 674 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eastex Aviation, Inc. v. Sperry & Hutchinson Company
See, e. g., Silver v. New York Stock Exchange, 373 U.S. 341 , 83 S.Ct. 1246 , 10 L.Ed.2d 389 (1963) (securities market subject to antitrust regulation) ; United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass’n, 322 U.S. 533 , 64 S.Ct. 1162 , 88 L.Ed. 1440 (1944) (insurance business subject to antitrust regulation) ; Pacific Seafarers, Inc. v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc., 131 U.S.App.D.C. 226 , 404 F.2d 804 (1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1093 , 89 S.Ct. 872 , 21 L.Ed.2d 784 (1969) (service industries subject to antitrust regulation) ; accord, United States v. Pennsylvania Refuse Removal Service, 24…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Richard Pratt, Donald C. Wilson A/K/A \Snooks\" John Richard Pratt"
(2×)
See United States v. Pennsylvania Refuse Removal Ass’n, 242 F.Supp. 794, 798 (E.D.Pa. 1965), aff’d., 357 F.2d 806 (3 Cir.), cert. den., 384 U.S. 961 , 86 S.Ct. 1588 , 16 L.Ed.2d 674 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donna Angle v. Sky Chef, Inc., a Corporation, Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, Intervenor-Appellee
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Glickman, 450 F.2d 416, 419 (9th Cir. 1971); see also Washington State Bowling Proprietors Association v. Pacific Lanes, Inc., 356 F.2d 371, 377 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 963 , 86 S.Ct. 1590 , 16 L.Ed.2d 674 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. General Electric Company, and International Union of Electrical, Radio, and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor
(2×)
See, e. g., Independent Stave Co. v. NLRB, 352 F.2d 553 (8th Cir. 1965), cert, denied, 384 U.S. 962 , 86 S.Ct. 1558 , 16 L.Ed.2d 674 (1966) (by implication).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pennsylvania Refuse Removal Association
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 1211.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 31, 1966.
J. Francis Hayden for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Howard E. Shapiro for the United States.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.