green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Walker v. Woodford
See Beardslee v. Woodford, 395 F.3d 1064, 1067 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1096 , 125 S.Ct. 982 , 160 L.Ed.2d 910 (2005); Arcamuzi v. Continental Air Lines, Inc., 819 F.2d 935, 937 (9th Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Taylor v. Larry Crawford etc.
Lethal injection itself “is commonly thought to be the most humane form of execution.” Abdur’Rahman v. Bredesen, 181 S.W.3d 292, 306 (Tenn.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2288 , 164 L.Ed.2d 813 (2006); see also Beardslee v. Woodford, 395 F.3d 1064, 1074 (9th Cir.) (specifically noting that humane concerns were a motivation for adopting lethal injection as the presumptive method of execution in California), cer t. denied, 543 U.S. 1096 , 125 S.Ct. 982 , 160 L.Ed.2d 910 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. Crawford
Lethal injection itself "is commonly thought to be the most humane form of execution." Abdur'Rahman v. Bredesen, 181 S.W.3d 292, 306 (Tenn.2005), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2288 , 164 L.Ed.2d 813 (2006); see also Beardslee v. Woodford, 395 F.3d 1064, 1074 (9th Cir.) (specifically noting that humane concerns were a motivation for adopting lethal injection as the presumptive method of execution in California), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1096 , 125 S.Ct. 982 , 160 L.Ed.2d 910 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bieghler v. State
See, eg., Beardslee v. Woodford, 395 F.3d 1064, 1076 (9th Cir.2005), cert. denied, 548 U.S. 1096 , 125 S.Ct. 982 , 160 L.Ed.2d 910 (2005); Cooper v. Rimmer, 379 F.3d 1029, 1031-83 (9th Cir.2004); Reid v. Johnson, 388 F.Supp.2d 548, 552-58 (E.D.Va.2004); State v. Webb, 252 Conn. 128 , 750 A.2d 448, 454-56 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 885 , 121 S.Ct. 98 , 148 L.Ed.2d 53 (2000); Sims v. State, 754 So.2d 657, 666-68 (Fla.2000), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1188 , 120 S.Ct. 12833 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1122 (2000); Morrow v. State, 21 S.W.3d 819, 828 (Mo.2000), cert. denied 531 U.S. 1171 , 121 S.Ct. 1140 , 148 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Housey Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
v.
Astrazeneca UK Ltd. Et Al.
v.
Astrazeneca UK Ltd. Et Al.
04-695.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 2005.
O'Connor, Breyer.
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor and Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.