green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Rivera v. Lempke
See Ortiz v. McBride, 380 F.3d 649, 654 (2d Cir.2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1187 , 125 S.Ct. 1398 , 161 L.Ed.2d 190 (2005); Brooks v. Chappius, 450 F.Supp.2d 220, 223-24 (W.D.N.Y.2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Allah v. Poole
See Ortiz v. McBride, 380 F.3d 649, 654 (2d Cir.2004) (“under abnormal or unusual SHU conditions, periods of confinement of less than 101 days may implicate a liberty interest”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1187 , 125 S.Ct. 1398 , 161 L.Ed.2d 190 (2005); Sealey v. Giltner, 197 F.3d 578, 586 (2d Cir.1999) (“Both the conditions and their duration must be considered, since especially harsh conditions endured for a brief interval ... might ... be atypical”) (citation omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
Bryan v. BellSouth Communications, Inc.
See Bryan v. BellSouth Telecomms., Inc., 543 U.S. 1187 , 125 S.Ct. 1398 , 161 L.Ed.2d 190 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
See Coeur D’Alene Tribe v. Hammond, 384 F.3d 674 , 692 (9th Cir.2004) (providing that we may consult legislative history if a statutory provision is ambiguous), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1187 , 125 S.Ct. 1397 , 161 L.Ed.2d 190 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
White Tail Park, Inc. v. Stroube
See Bryan v. Bellsouth Communications, Inc., 377 F.3d 424, 428 (4th Cir.2004), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 1398 , 161 L.Ed.2d 190 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
White Tail Park, Incorporated v. Stroube
See Bryan v. Bellsouth Communications, Inc., 377 F.3d 424, 428 (4th Cir.2004), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 1398 , 161 L.Ed.2d 190 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roseboro v. Gillespie
See also Palmer v. Richards, 364 F.3d 60, 64 (2d Cir.2004) ("A prisoner’s liberty interest *377 is implicated by prison discipline, such as SHU confinement, only if the discipline 'imposes [an] atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life,' 'and we read Sandin to require that we look to actual punishment in making this determination.’ Factors relevant to determining whether the plaintiff endured an ‘atypical and significant hardship' include 'the extent to which the conditions of the disciplinary segregation differ from other routin…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Central Iowa Power Cooperative v. Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
See 18 C.F.R. § 35.2 (b) n. 1 (defining a “tariff’ as “a compilation ... of rate schedules of a particular public utility”); id. § 35.2(b) (defining a “[r]ate schedule” as including a statement of “rates and charges for or in connection with [electric] service,” and “all classifications, practices, rules, regulations or contracts which in any manner affect or relate to [such] service, rates, and charges” (emphasis added)); see also Bryan v. BellSouth Commc’ns, Inc., 377 F.3d 424, 429 (4th Cir.2004) (“[A] filed tariff carries the force of federal law.”), cert. denied…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brooks v. Chappius
See also Ortiz v. McBride, 380 F.3d 649, 654 (2d Cir.2004) (“unusually harsh conditions” may implicate liberty interest even for relatively short periods of SHU confinement), cer t. denied, 543 U.S. 1187 , 125 S.Ct. 1398 , 161 L.Ed.2d 190 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boomer v. DePerio
See, e.g., Ortiz v. McBride, 380 F.3d 649, 653-54 (2d Cir. 2004) (finding that inmate plaintiff had exhausted his remedies as to his due process claim, but not as to his Eighth Amendment claim, since his administrative grievance did not allege Eighth Amendment violation), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1398 , 161 L.Ed.2d 190 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
Consolidated City of Jacksonville, Florida
v.
Consolidated City of Jacksonville, Florida
04-718.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 28, 2005.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
WILLIAMS ET AL.
v.
CONSOLIDATED CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA, ET AL.
No. 04-718.
Supreme Court of United States.
February 28, 2005.
1
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 341 F. 3d 1261.