Gonzales, Attorney Gen. v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao Do Vegetal, 544 U.S. 973 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Gonzales, Attorney Gen. v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao Do Vegetal, 544 U.S. 973 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (59 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: North Sails Group, LLC v. Boards & More GMBH (conn, 2021-08-20)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" North Sails Group, LLC v. Boards & More GMBH
Conn. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
Accordingly, [the court has] upheld the assertion of jurisdiction over defendants who have purposefully ‘reach[ed] out beyond’ their [s]tate and into another by, for example, entering a contractual relationship that ‘envisioned continuing and [wide reaching] contacts’ in the forum [s]tate . . . .’’ (Citations omitted.) Id., 285 ; see Ford Motor Co. v. Montana Eighth Judicial District Court, supra, 1025 . 15 Plainly, Connecticut has a general interest in ‘‘providing a forum in which [its] residents can seek redress for injuries caused by out-of-state actors.’’ (Internal quot…
cited Cited "see" Agape Flights, Inc. v. Covington Aircraft Engines, Inc.
E.D. Okla. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Benton v. Cameco Corp., 375 F.3d 1070, 1080 (10th Cir.2004), cert. denied 544 U.S. 974 , 125 S.Ct. 1826 , 161 L.Ed.2d 723 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Nilson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
D. Utah · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao do Vegetal v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 973, 975 (10th Cir.2004), cert. granted, 544 U.S. 973 , 125 S.Ct. 1846 , 161 L.Ed.2d 723 (2005), aff'd and remanded, 546 U.S. 418 , 126 S.Ct. 1211 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1017 (2006).
cited Cited "see" George Samuel Green, Jr. v. Stanley K. Young Syed Z. Ahsan, Psychiatrist David Jones, Psychologist Kimberly Ann Bays, Mental Health Supervisor/wrsp
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nagy v. FMC Butner, 376 F.3d 252, 255-56 (4th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 973 , 125 S.Ct. 1823 , 161 L.Ed.2d 723 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" TH Agriculture & Nutrition, LLC v. Ace European Group Ltd. (2×)
D. Kan. · 2006 · signal: accord · confidence high
“Whether a non-resident defendant has the requisite minimum contacts with the forum state to establish in personam jurisdiction must be decided on the particular facts of each case.” Kuenzle v. HTM Sport-Und Freizeitgerate AG, 102 F.3d 453, 456 (10th Cir.1996); accord Benton v. Cameco Corp., 375 F.3d 1070, 1076 (10th Cir.2004), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 1826 , 161 L.Ed.2d 723 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Australian Gold, Inc. v. Hatfield
10th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nissan Motor Co. v. Nissan Computer Corp., 378 F.3d 1002, 1018 (9th Cir.2004) (holding that initial interest confusion occurs when a defendant uses a plaintiffs trademark in a way calculated to capture a consumer’s attention and divert the consumer to the defendant’s own Web site), cert. denied, — U.S. ---, 125 S.Ct. 1825 , 161 L.Ed.2d 723 (2005); Brookfield Commc’ns, Inc. v. W.
cited Cited "see" Pro Axess, Inc. v. Orlux Distribution, Inc.
10th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Benton v. Cameco Corp., 375 F.3d 1070, 1075 (10th Cir.2004), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 1826 , 161 L.Ed.2d 723 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Short v. United States, 50 F.3d 994, 999 (Fed.Cir.1995); see also Shoshone Indian Tribe of Wind River Reservation v. United States, 364 F.3d 1339 , 1353 (Fed.Cir.2004), ce rt. denied, 544 U.S. 973 , 125 S.Ct. 1824 , 1826, 161 L.Ed.2d 723 (2005) (finding that 25 U.S.C. §§ 161a, 161b, and 162a require defendant to earn interest on trust funds). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Saguaro Chevrolet, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Mitchell (Mitchell II), 463 U.S. 206, 225 , 103 S.Ct. 2961 , 77 L.Ed.2d 580 (1983) (noting “the undisputed existence of a general trust relationship between the United States and the Indian people”); Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 5 Pet. 1, 16-18 , 8 L.Ed. 25 (1831) (characterizing what is now the trust relationship between the United States and Indian people); see also Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation v. United States, 364 F.3d 1339, 1348 (Fed.Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 973 , 125 S.Ct. 1824 , 1826, 161 L.Ed.2d 723 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gonzales, Attorney General
v.
O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao Do Vegetal
04-1084.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 2005.
544 U.S. 973
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

544 U.S. 973

GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.
v.
O CENTRO ESPIRITA BENEFICENTE UNIAO DO VEGETAL ET AL.

No. 04-1084.

Supreme Court of United States.

April 18, 2005.

1

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted. Reported below: 389 F. 3d 973.