green
Positive treatment
Trending · 261 recent citers
Quoted verbatim 2×
17.3 score
“when a defendant objects to a factual finding that is used in calculating his guideline 683 sentence, such as drug amount, the government bears the burden of establishing the disputed fact by a preponderance of the evidence.”
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Michael Maurice Whelan
when a defendant objects to a factual finding that is used in calculating his guideline 683 sentence, such as drug amount, the government bears the burden of establishing the disputed fact by a preponderance of the evidence.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Justino Santa
e-cause rodriguez did not object on this basis in the district court, our review is only for plain error.
cited
Cited "see"
Price v. City of Sutherlin
See Smith v. City of Hemet, 394 F.3d 689, 700 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1128 , 125 S.Ct. 2938 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Udo Udo Ekpo, Jr.
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Corley
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hansa L. Christopher
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Segalla
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roderick D. WIlliams
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Glenn Chiesa
(2×)
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arnold Sylvester Lindsay, Jr.
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey Tobin
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William D. Morris
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Laquan Dwayne Carter, Also Known as \Quan
See Pirani, 406 F.3d at 553 (quoting United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1301 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. LaQuan Carter
See Pirani, 406 F.3d at 553 (quoting United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1301 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Isaac Jerome Smith
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Jerome Bell
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005). 12 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Claude Lee Woods
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1301 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wyatt Henderson
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005); see also United States v. Schulte, 264 F.3d 656, 662 (6th Cir.2001) (persuasive authority) (reviewing for plain error the appellant’s argument, made for the first time on appeal, that the district court erred by failing to obtain an updated PSI for resentencing).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Frederick Marion Holliman, Jr.
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jacky Bernard
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1296 (11th Cir.) cert. denied 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cecilia Henry
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus Espinoza-Guerrero
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Christopher James Williams
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1296 (11th Cir.) cert. denied 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Julio Mejia Hernandez
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Niyonu Spaulding
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Terence Devon Hamilton
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1299 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eligio Perez
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291 , *807 1299 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Lamar Williams
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1299 (11th Cir.2005), cert, denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Geneva Ellwood
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1301 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 545 U.S. 1127 , 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005) (noting that Booker specifically provides for extra-verdict enhancements in all future sentencings and that the same extra-verdict enhancement provisions apply after Booker as before).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosalind Johnson
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005). 1 Under plain-error review, an appellant must show that there was (1) an error, (2) that is plain, (3) that affects the appellant’s substantial rights, and (4) that affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial proceedings.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mykael Y. Sprague
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005). 2 We recognize two kinds of Booker error: 1) constitutional error resulting from enhancements based on impermissible judicial fact-finding, and 2) statutory error resulting from application of the guidelines in a mandatory fashion.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Deana Honeycutt
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1296 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Saint R. Murphy
See United States v. Shelton, 400 F.3d 1325, 1331 (11th Cir.2005) (“Booker error exists when the district court misapplies the Guidelines by considering them as binding as opposed to advisory.”). “[B]oth majority opinions in Booker make clear that the decisive factor that makes pre-Booker sentencing problematic is not extra-verdict enhancements but their use in a mandatory guidelines system.” United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1301 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 ; see also United States v. Chau, 426 F.3d 1318, 1323-24 (11th Cir.2005) (hold…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mario Luna-Mora
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291 , 1298 *849 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stanley Lawes
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert, denied,-U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Ashby Ex Rel. M.A. v. Dyer
See Manion v. Nagin, 394 F.3d 1062 , 1065 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. --, 125 S.Ct. 2939 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jasper Moore
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1297-98 (11th Cir.) (reviewing a newly raised Booker challenge for plain error), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Damon Depreece Garrett
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1297-98 (11th Cir.) (reviewing a newly raised Booker challenge for plain error), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Jose Emilio Flores
(2×)
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005). 2 To prevail under this standard, *64 Flores must show “(1) error, (2) that is plain, and (3) that affects substantial rights.” Id. (internal quotations and citations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Allen Hill
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1296 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005). *821 In Vazquez , the defendant argued that the district court improperly enhanced his base offense level under § 2S1.3(b)(l), based on the court’s finding that the defendant “knew or believed that the funds were criminally derived property.” See Vazquez, 53 F.3d at 1226 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles E. Daniels
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1300 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerardo De Jesus Matute-Santos
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir.2005) cert. denied, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dimas Penaloza Rios
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio Carlos-Santos
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), ceri. denied, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005). 2 The district court committed no Sixth Amendment error.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Angel L. Davila-Rodriguez
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d *407 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.) (applying plain-error review to a newly-raised Blakely/Booker claim), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Gardner
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005). 4 We see no error, plain or otherwise, in the district court’s refusal to depart downward based on sentencing disparity between co-defendants involved in the same offense.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Venester Fayne
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1297-98 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005). 4 Fayne admitted to violating terms of supervised release: no Sixth Amendment violation occurred.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerome McKenzie
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1297 (11th Cir.) (“Booker [holds] that the Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury is violated where under a mandatory guidelines system a sentence is increased because of an enhancement based on facts found by the judge that were neither admitted by the defendant nor found by a jury.”) (emphasis omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy David Queen
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1298 (11th Cir.), cert. denied — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005) (holding that a defen *91 dant’s failure to object to his sentence on Sixth Amendment grounds meant that this Court would review only for plain error).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Lee Green, Jr.
See United States v. Rodriguez, 398 F.3d 1291, 1296 (11th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2935 , 162 L.Ed.2d 866 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of Hemet, California
v.
Smith
v.
Smith
No. 04-1374.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 2005.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.