green
Positive treatment
Trending · 89 recent citers
Quoted verbatim 1×
24.4 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Com. v. Preacher, J.
phrased differently, a defendant cannot escape the pcra time-bar by titling his petition or motion as a writ of habeas corpus.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gabriel Aguirre
See 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (f)(4). -6- public reputation of judicial proceedings.” United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 550 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (cleaned up), cert denied, 546 U.S. 909 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Swehla
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 549 (8th Cir. 2002) (en banc), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 909 (2005).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Keith Novak
(3×)
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 550 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 909 , 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alphonso Wynn
(2×)
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 549 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 909 , 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Corey Steffen
(2×)
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 549 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 909 , 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce Humphrey
(2×)
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 549 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 909 , 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005); United States v. Jacobson, 406 Fed.Appx. 91, 92 (8th Cir.2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sun Bear v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 553 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 909 , 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Brown
(2×)
See United, States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 553 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied,, 546 U.S. 909 , 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005). 2 Finally, Brown argues that the modified special conditions of supervised *667 release constitute error.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Carr
(2×)
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 555 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 909 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carr
(2×)
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 555 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 909 , 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodney M. Raglin
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543 , 551 n.4 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (standard of proof), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 909 (2005). -2- On appeal, Raglin concedes that his conduct satisfied the elements of aggravated assault if no defense applied. “[T]he offense of aggravated assault was accomplished when appellant displayed the firearm and pointed it at the victim.” Tarpley v. State, --- S.W.3d ----, 2006 WL 3616403 (Ark.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raglin
(2×)
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543 , 551 n. 4 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (standard of proof), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 909 , 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gonzalez-Barreiro
See United States v. Bringier, 405 F.3d 310 , 317 & n. 4 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 909 , 126 S.Ct. 264 , 163 L.Ed.2d 238 (2005). Í3] Gonzalez-Barreiro contends that the presumption of reasonableness this court accords sentences imposed within the advisory guidelines range erroneously constrains the district court’s discretion.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnny Ray McAtee
See United States v. Pi-rani 406 F.3d 543, 555 (8th Cir.2005) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005) (holding that admission of profanity was not unduly prejudicial).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Paul Patterson
See generally United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 549-50 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Brian Bern
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543 , 551 n. 4 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (Booker does not require sentencing judges to find sentence-enhancing facts beyond reasonable doubt), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Erroll Flynn Shepard, United States of America v. Tony Skannell, Also Known as Tomcat, United States of America v. Barry Renfold Cooley, United States of America v. Roy G. Straughan, Also Known as George Clark, Also Known as C-Note (3), Also Known as C-Nutt (3)
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543 , 551 n. 4 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Erroll Flynn Shepard
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543 , 551 n. 4 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce Dewayne Jensen
See Kroeger, 229 F.3d at 703 (concluding 30-month error seriously affected fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings); Comstock, 154 F.3d at 850 (reaching same conclusion as to 17-month error); United States v. Marsanico, 61 F.3d 666, 668 (8th Cir.1995) (not correcting 21-month error would result in miscarriage of justice); accord United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 553-54 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (describing Comstock , among other cases, as “reflecting] proper concern that the fairness, integrity, and public reputation of judicial proceedings are seriously affected wh…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven E. Smith
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 550 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronnie C. Gaines
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 549 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jedediah Conelly
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 550 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alan Lee Ault
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543 , 551 n. 4 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony James Smith
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 549 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arnold D. Eastin
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 549-50 (8th Cir.2005) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 *1023 S.Ct. 266, 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Willie C. Johnson
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arnold Darrell Ball
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 549 (8th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clinton B. Allen
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 551 , 551 n. 4 (8th Cir.2005) (en banc), cert. denied — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Vaca-Arceo
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 550 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Damarious Simmons
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 548-49 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dale M. Willis
See United States v. Pirani 406 F.3d 543, 549-50 (8th Cir.2005) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alejandro Rivera
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 550-53 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Johnson
See United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 552 (8th Cir.2005) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Shamdis-Deen, K.
See also Commonwealth v. Pagan, 864 A.2d 1231, 1233 (Pa. Super. 2004) (“if the underlying substantive claim is one that could potentially be remedied under the PCRA, that claim is exclusive to the PCRA”) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 909 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Arrington, A.
See also Commonwealth v. Pagan, 864 A.2d 1231, 1233 (Pa. Super. 2004) (“if the underlying substantive claim is one that could potentially be remedied under the PCRA, that claim is exclusive to the PCRA”) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 909 (2005).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris v. Chand
(4×)
McPheeters, 427 F.3d at 1101 ; see also United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 555 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (a district court's evidentiary rulings are reviewed for a clear abuse of discretion) [2] , cert. denied 546 U.S. 909 , 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Karen Harris v. Dinesh Chand
McPheeters, 427 F.3d at 1101 ; see also United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 555 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (a -3- district court’s evidentiary rulings are reviewed for a clear abuse of discretion)2, cert. denied 546 U.S. 909 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Phillips
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543 , 551 & n. 4 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 909 , 126 S.Ct. 266 , 163 L.Ed.2d 239 (2005).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Lee Phillips
See, e.g., United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543 , 551 & n.4 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 909 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Crump
See United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 244 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) (any fact other than prior conviction which is necessary to support sentence exceeding maximum authorized by facts established by guilty plea or jury verdict must be admitted by defendant or proved to jury beyond reasonable doubt); Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 244-46 , 118 S.Ct. 1219 , 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) (recidivism, as basis for increasing sentence, need not be charged in indictment and may be subsequently decided by court at sentencing); United States v. Strong, 415 F.3d 902, 907 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nunley
v.
Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center
v.
Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center
No. 05-5548.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2005.
Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.