Jackson v. Giurbino, 546 U.S. 963 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Jackson v. Giurbino, 546 U.S. 963 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
61 citation events (61 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Byrd v. State (texapp, 2010-09-15)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Byrd v. State (2×)
Tex. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Fuller v. State, 73 S.W.3d 250, 252 (Tex.Crim.App.2002) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 324 n. 16, 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)); see also Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 729-30 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 962 , 126 S.Ct. 481 , 163 L.Ed.2d 367 (2005) (stating sufficiency of evidence review requires viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Reyes v. State
Tex. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
We review a federal due process challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence by determining whether a rational trier of fact could have found the “substantive elements of the offense as defined by state law” beyond a reasonable doubt. *80 Fuller v. State, 73 S.W.3d 250, 252 (Tex.Crim.App.2002) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 , 324 n. 16, 99 S.Ct. 2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)); see also Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 729-30 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, 546 U.S. 962 , 126 S.Ct. 481 , 163 L.Ed.2d 367 (2005) (stating sufficiency of evidence review requires viewing the evi…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tijerina v. State
Tex. App. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Prible v. State, 175 S.W.3d 724, 729-30 (Tex.Crim.App.), cer t. denied, 546 U.S. 962 , 126 S.Ct. 481 , 163 L.Ed.2d 367 (2005) (holding that when reviewing evidence for legal sufficiency, appellate court reviews all of evidence in light most favorable to verdict to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found essential elements of offense beyond reasonable doubt); Watson v. State, 204 S.W.3d 404, 414-25 (Tex.Crim.App.2006) (holding that when review ing evidence for factual sufficiency, appellate court reviews all of evidence in neutral light and sets aside verdict on…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jackson
v.
Giurbino, Warden
No. 05-5799.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 17, 2005.
546 U.S. 963
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.