Skokomish Indian Tribe v. United States, 546 U.S. 1090 (2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Skokomish Indian Tribe v. United States, 546 U.S. 1090 (2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: California Trout, Inc. v. United States Bureau of Reclamation (cacd, 2015-06-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) California Trout, Inc. v. United States Bureau of Reclamation
C.D. Cal. · 2015 · confidence medium
In one case, Oregon Natural Desert Ass’n v. Tidwell, 716 F.Supp.2d. 982 (D.Or.2010), the court found that even though consultation had been reinitiated, “declaratory relief remains available, as is future injunctive relief. .In particular, the coming grazing season will be managed under the [original] BiOp and declaratory judgment that the Forest Service violated the ESA by failing to timely reinitiate formal consultation could provide effective relief.” Id. at 995; see also WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Forest Serv., 2011 WL 11717438 , *5 (D.Ariz.2011) (finding that defendant was “unabl…
discussed Cited "see" Nicholas Coffey v. Adam Carroll
6th Cir. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See *584 Fox v. DeSoto , 489 F.3d 227 , 237 (6th Cir. 2007) (citing McKinley v. City of Mansfield , 404 F.3d 418 , 444-45 (6th Cir. 2005), cert. denied , 546 U.S. 1090 , 126 S.Ct. 1026 , 163 L.Ed.2d 854 (2006) ).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Mackins
4th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
The law of the case must be applied: “in all subsequent proceedings in the same case in the trial court or on a later appeal ... unless: (1) a subsequent trial produces substantially different evidence, (2) controlling authority has since made a contrary decision of law applicable to the issue, or (3) the prior decision was clearly erroneous and would work manifest injustice.” Id. (quoting Sejman v. Warner-Lambert Co., 845 F.2d 66, 69 (4th Cir.1988)); see Invention Submission Corp. v. Dudas, 413 F.3d 411, 414-15 (4th Cir.2005) (discussing “mandate rule,” which “is a more powerful ver…
cited Cited "see" Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
D. Ariz. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Washington Toxics Coalition v. Environmental Protection Agency, 413 F.3d 1024, 1034 (9th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1024 , 163 L.Ed.2d 854 (2006).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Divine
4th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Invention Submission Corp. v. Dudas, 413 F.3d 411, 414-15 (4th Cir.2005) (discussing mandate rule), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1024 , 163 L.Ed.2d 854 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Naples v. Naples
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Coon v. Coon, 364 S.C. 563 , 614 S.E.2d 616, 617-18 (2005) (holding USFSPA "supplants state domestic-relations law pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, but it does not pre-empt state-court subject-matter jurisdiction"), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1090 , 126 S.Ct. 1025 , 163 L.Ed.2d 854 (2006); Curtis v. Curtis, 7 Cal. App.4th 1 , 9 Cal.Rptr.2d 145, 151 (1992) (holding USFSPA does not implicate subject matter jurisdiction); Cent.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Currence
4th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Aramony, 166 F.3d 655, 661 (4th Cir.1999) (discussing doctrine and exceptions thereto); see also Invention Submission Corp. v. Dudas, 413 F.3d 411, 414-15 (4th Cir.2005) (discussing mandate rule), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1090 , 126 S.Ct. 1024 , 163 L.Ed.2d 854 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Skokomish Indian Tribe
v.
United States
No. 05-434.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 2006.
546 U.S. 1090
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.