Courtney v. United States, 546 U.S. 1092 (2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Courtney v. United States, 546 U.S. 1092 (2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rosario Lindsey, Individually and as of the Estate of Charles Lindsey v. Caterpillar, Inc (ca3, 2007-03-26)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Rosario Lindsey, Individually and as of the Estate of Charles Lindsey v. Caterpillar, Inc
3rd Cir. · 2007 · confidence medium
In its memorandum opinion granting summary judgment, the District Court adopted the reasoning set forth by the New Jersey Supreme Court in Gonzalez v. Ideal Tile Importing Co., 184 N.J. 415 , 877 A.2d 1247 (2005), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1042 , 163 L.Ed.2d 857 *207 (2006), which addressed the issue of whether the Act may preempt tort claims against a forklift manufacturer whose product was in compliance with agency standards for warning devices.
discussed Cited "see" Grow Co., Inc. v. Chokshi
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gonzalez v. Ideal Tile Importing Co., Inc., 371 N.J.Super. 349, 356-57 , 853 A. 2d 298 (App.Div.2004) (recognizing that the denial of summary judgment "is not subject to the law of the case doctrine because it decides nothing and merely reserves issues for future disposition"), aff'd, 184 N.J. 415 , 877 A. 2d 1247 (2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1092 , 126 S.Ct. 1042 , 163 L.Ed. 2d 857 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" Booth Oil Site Administrative Group v. Safety-Kleen Corp.
W.D.N.Y. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beazer East, Inc. v. Mead Corp., 412 F.3d 429 (3rd Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1091 , 126 S.Ct. 1040 , 163 L.Ed.2d 857 (2006); Alcan, 990 F.2d at 722 (“apportionment itself is an intensely factual determination.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Carrier Corporation v. Outokumpu Oyj
6th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Empagran S.A. v. F. Hoffmann-LaRoche, Ltd., 417 F.3d 1267, 1268-69 (D.C.Cir.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1092 , 126 S.Ct. 1043 , 163 L.Ed.2d 857 (2006); United States v. LSL Biotechnologies, 379 F.3d 672, 677-79 (9th Cir.2004); United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Angus Chem.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Div. of Youth & Fam. Svcs. v. Jd
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
It is not meant to prevent a judge from changing a prior decision following "a newly developed basis in fact, law or context upon which to revisit a ruling made in the pre-trial stage." Higgins, supra, 315 N.J.Super. at 492 , 719 A. 2d 166 ; see also Gonzalez v. Ideal Tile Importing Co., 371 N.J.Super. 349, 356 , 853 A. 2d 298 (App.Div.2004) (holding that judges are not obligated "to slavishly follow an erroneous or uncertain interlocutory ruling"), aff'd, 184 N.J. 415 , 877 A. 2d 1247 (2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1092 , 126 S.Ct. 1042 , 163 L.Ed. 2d 857 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Courtney
v.
United States
No. 05-542.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 2006.
546 U.S. 1092
Published

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.