Members of the Peanut Quota Holders Ass'n v. United States, 126 S. Ct. 2967 (2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Members of the Peanut Quota Holders Ass'n v. United States, 126 S. Ct. 2967 (2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2011–2013 · …standing and privity of contract with the government are questions of subject matter jurisdiction. ⚠ not in text
62 citation events (59 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lea v. United States (uscfc, 2016-04-25)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Lea v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2016 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the government consents to be sued only by those with whom it has privity of contract.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Ogunniyi v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2015 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the government consents to be sued only by those with whom it has privity of 532 contract.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Estes Express Lines v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2013 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
standing and privity of contract with the government are questions of subject matter jurisdiction.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Normandy Apartments, Ltd. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2011 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
standing and privity of contract with the government are questions of subject matter jurisdiction.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Morris v. BC OLYMPIAKOS, SFP
S.D. Tex. · 2010 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
where a defendant challenges personal jurisdiction, the party seeking to invoke the power of the court bears the burden of proving that jurisdiction exists.
discussed Cited "see" State ex rel. AWMS Water Solutions, L.L.C. v. Mertz (2×)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Members of the Peanut Quota Holders Assn., Inc. v. United States, 421 F.3d 1323, 1331 (Fed.Cir.2005), cert. denied, 548 U.S. 904 , 126 S.Ct. 2967 , 165 L.Ed.2d 951 (2006); see Kafka at 96 ; Conti at 1341-1342 ; Am.
cited Cited "see" Sinclair v. Studiocanal, S.A.
E.D. La. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Luv N’ Care v. Instar-Mix, Inc., 438 F.3d 465, 469 (5th Cir.2006), cert. denied, 548 U.S. 904 , 126 S.Ct. 2968 , 165 L.Ed.2d 951 (2006).
cited Cited "see" Kittelson v. Nafrawi
5th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Henderson v. Stalder, 407 F.3d 351, 354 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2967 , 165 L.Ed.2d 950 (2006).
cited Cited "see" Cortes v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
D. Conn. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Flury v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., 427 F.3d 939, 944 (11th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 2967 , 165 L.Ed.2d 950 (2006); King v. Ill.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Phillips v. ABB Combustion Engineering, Inc.
E.D. La. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
Int’l Corp., 523 F.3d 602, 609 (5th Cir.2008); see also Luv N’ Care v. Insta-Mix, Inc., 438 F.3d 465, 469 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 548 U.S. 904 , 126 S.Ct. 2968 , 165 L.Ed.2d 951 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Davison v. Cole Sewell Corp.
6th Cir. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Flury v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., 427 F.3d 939, 943-44 (11th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 126 S.Ct. 2967 , 165 L.Ed.2d 950 (2006); Hodge v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 360 F.3d 446, 449-50 (4th Cir.2004); King v. III.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MEMBERS OF the PEANUT QUOTA HOLDERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 05-1225.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 26, 2006.
126 S. Ct. 2967
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
4 passages pin-cited by 5 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 89%
Citer courts: Federal Claims (4) · S.D. Texas (1)

[*2968] Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.