green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Holland v. Hogan
But cf. Zwickler v. Koota, 261 F.Supp. 985 (E.D.N.Y.1966), prob. jurisd. noted, 386 U.S. 906 , 87 S.Ct. 854 , 17 L.Ed.2d 781 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chase v. Page
(2×)
See Mempa v. Rhay, 386 U.S. 907 , 87 S.Ct. 849 , 17 L.Ed.2d 781 and Walkling v. Rhay, 386 U.S. 907 , 87 S.Ct. 852 , 17 L.Ed.2d 781 .” 267 F.Supp., at 434 . ****** “While the petitioner’s liberty cannot be terminated without reason, it does not follow that he is entitled to all of the constitutional procedures and safeguards guaranteed by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” 267 F. Supp., at 434 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hutchison v. Patterson
(2×)
See Mempa v. Rhay, 386 U.S. 907 , 87 S.Ct. 849 , 17 L.Ed.2d 781 and Walkling v. Rhay, 386 U.S. 907 , 87 S.Ct. 852 , 17 L.Ed.2d 781 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Zwickler
v.
Koota, District Attorney of County of Kings
v.
Koota, District Attorney of County of Kings
No. 810.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 13, 1967.
Emanuel Redfield for appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, for appellee.
Published
Appeal from D. C. E. D. N. Y. Probable jurisdiction noted.