green
Positive treatment
Trending · 107 recent citers
Quoted verbatim 2×
24.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2010 ·
…this court has no obligation to construct and compose appellant's issues, facts, and arguments with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 43 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lizcano, Juan
this court has no obligation to construct and compose appellant's issues, facts, and arguments with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lizcano, Juan
this court has no obligation to construct and compose appellant's issues, facts, and arguments with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martir Martinez-Games
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008); United States v. Peltier, 505 F.3d 389, 391-92 (5th Cir.2007).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Garrett Rushing
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 807 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brad Eardley
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 809 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008); United States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 471 (5th Cir.2006).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mohammed Hayat
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez-Hernandez
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Henriquez-Villafuerte
See United States v. Fambro, 526 F.3d 836 , 851 & n. 96 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008); United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 626 (5th Cir.2007).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 809 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mendoza-Garcia
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stone
See United States v. Fambro, 526 F.3d 836 , 851 & n. 96 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baudel Ortiz
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806-07 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008); see also United States v. Williams, 517 F.3d 801, 809 (5th Cir.2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Soto
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008); United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 361 (5th Cir.2009), petition for cert, filed, (June 24, 2009) (08-11099).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 809 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008); United States v. Candía, 454 F.3d 468, 479 (5th Cir.2006).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 809 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 625 (2008); United States v. Candia, 454 F.3d 468, 479 (5th Cir. 2006).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Whitelaw
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Haberman
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008). 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Russell
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Flores
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Grant
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
Whitaker, Thomas Bartlett
See Busby v. State , 253 S.W.3d 661, 667 (Tex.Cr.App.), cert. denied , 129 S.Ct. 625 (2008) (rejecting various constitutional challenges to Article 37.071 including the claim that it is unconstitutional because the mitigation special issue fails to place a burden of proof on the State) (point of error six); Gallo v. State , 239 S.W.3d 757, 780 (Tex.Cr.App.), cert. denied , 128 S.Ct. 2872 (2008) (execution-protocol claim not ripe for review on direct appeal because the defendant's execution is not imminent) (point of error five); Roberts v. State , 220 S.W.3d 521, 534 (Tex.Cr.App.), cert. denie…
discussed
Cited "see"
Whitaker v. State
See Busby v. State, 253 S.W.3d 661, 667 (Tex.Cr.App.), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008) (rejecting various constitutional challenges to Article 37.071 including the claim that it is unconstitutional because the mitigation special issue fails to place a burden of proof on the State) (point of error six); Gallo v. State, 239 S.W.3d 757, 780 (Tex.Cr.App.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 2872 , 171 L.Ed.2d 813 (2008) (execution-protocol claim not ripe for review on direct appeal because the defendant’s execution is not imminent) (point of error five); Roberts v. S…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Arriaga
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hernandez
See State v. Snell, 2007-NMCA-113, ¶ 10 , 142 N.M. 452 , 166 P.3d 1106 (recognizing that Miranda warnings are only necessary when a person is in custody at the time of interrogation), cert. denied by N.M. v. Snell, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 626 , 172 L.Ed.2d 608 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Myers
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir. 2008), cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 625 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Myers
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.2008), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cook
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 625 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cook
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
Otay Mesa Property L.P. v. United States
See Huntleigh USA Corp. v. United States, 525 F.3d 1370, 1378 (Fed.Cir.2008), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 626 , 172 L.Ed.2d 608 (2008) (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Romero-Facio
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ceballos-Silva
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.2008), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Goodman
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.8d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Reyna
See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , — L.Ed.2d - (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hernandez v. Thaler
See, e.g., United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804 , 808 n. 2 (5th Cir.) (per curiam) (“Arguments inadequately briefed on appeal are waived.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alcala-Avalos
See, e.g., United Stales v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008) ("When a defendant fails to raise a procedural objection below, appellate review is for plain error only.”). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Juan Rangel-Tapia
United States v. Brantley, 537 F.3d 347, 349 (5th Cir.2008) (quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 807 (5th Cir.) (upholding an upward variance based on the nature and characteristics of the defendant and his criminal history), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Manuel Martinez-Hernandez
The sentence imposed “was reasonable under the totality of the relevant statutory factors.” United States v. Brantley, 537 F.3d 347, 349 (5th Cir.2008) (quotation marks omitted); see also United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 807 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008) (upholding upward variance based on the nature and characteristics of the defendant and his criminal history).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cardenas v. State
Cardenas was harmed because of the denial as to juror number 28 because he (1) used a peremptory strike to remove juror number 28, (2) exhausted his peremptory strikes, (3) requested and was denied additional peremptory strikes, and (4) identified three specific objectionable veniremembers who sat on the jury and on whom he would have exercised peremptory strikes. 9 See Johnson v. State, 43 S.W.3d 1, 7 (Tex.Crim.App.2001) (holding that harm for a denial of a challenge to cause, which is based under the nonconstitutional error standard of rule of appellate procedure 44.2(b), requires these four…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Balleza-Cortez
United States v. Casper, 536 F.3d 409, 416 (5th Cir.2008), vacated on other grounds, — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 2156 , 173 L.Ed.2d 1153 (2009); see also United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 806-07 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cordova-Saavedra
Compare United States v. Jones, 444 F.3d 430, 434 (5th Cir.2006), with United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 807 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 625 , 172 L.Ed.2d 617 (2008).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gomez-Marin
As Gomez-Marin concedes, his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 559-64 (5th Cir.2008), petition for cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 624 , — L.Ed.2d - (2008); see also United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 808 (5th Cir.2008), petition for cert. denied, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 625 , - L.Ed.2d - (2008) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MOLA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 08-138.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Dec 1, 2008.
Cited by 92 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Criminal Appeals of T… (2)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.