Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A., 131 S. Ct. 565 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A., 131 S. Ct. 565 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (45 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Patria Laureano v. Attorney General United States of America (ca3, 2026-05-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Patria Laureano v. Attorney General United States of America
3rd Cir. · 2026 · signal: see · confidence high
See Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S.A., 562 U.S. 40 (2010); Freidrichs v. Cal. Teachers Assoc., 578 U.S. 1 (2016).
examined Cited "see" Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (3×)
SCOTUS · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S.A., 562 U.S. 40 , 131 S.Ct. 565 , 178 L.Ed.2d 470 (2010) ( per curiam ).
examined Cited "see" John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng (12×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
2d Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Omega S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 541 F.3d 982 (9th Cir.2008), aff’d by an evenly divided Court, Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S.A., -U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 565 , 178 L.Ed.2d 470 (2010). .
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States v. David Duvall (3×)
D.C. Cir. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng, 654 F.3d 210, 218 (2d Cir. 2011) (citing the lack of binding authority produced by the 4-4 split in Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S.A., 131 S. Ct. 565 (2010)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
SCOTUS · 2013 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare id., at 221 (case below) (“first sale” doctrine does not apply to copies manufactured outside the United States), with Omega S. A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 541 F. 3d 982, 986 (CA9 2008) (“first sale” doctrine applies to copies manufactured outside the United States only if an authorized first sale occurs within the United States), aff’d by an equally divided court, 562 U. S. 40 (2010), and Sebastian Int’l, Inc. v. Consumer Contacts (PTY) Ltd., 847 F. 2d 1093 , 1098, n. 1 (CA3 1988) (limitation of the first sale doctrine to copies made within the United States “does not …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Costco Wholesale Corp.
v.
Omega, S. A.
08-1423.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 13, 2010.
131 S. Ct. 565
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 562 U. S. ____ (2010) 1

Per Curiam

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________

No. 08–1423 _________________

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, PETITIONER v. OMEGA, S. A. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

[December 13, 2010]

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

JUSTICE KAGAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.