green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
11.7 score
“a person who buys dmv records in bulk does so for the purpose of making permissible actual use of information therein under , even if that person does 286 not actually use every single item of information therein”
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Duhs v. Capra
he broader significance of davis the declarant's purpose in speaking matters.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Norma Wiles v. Ascom Transport System, Inc.
a person who buys dmv records in bulk does so for the purpose of making permissible actual use of information therein under , even if that person does 286 not actually use every single item of information therein
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Howard v. CRIMINAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
a person who buys dmv records in bulk does so for the purpose of making permissible actual use of information therein under , even if that person does not actually use every single item of information therein.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jeun v. United States
Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc., 546 U.S. 975 , 126 S.Ct. 543 , 163 L.Ed.2d 458 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidentiy granted, 548 U.S. 124 , 126 S.Ct. 2921 , 165 L.Ed.2d 399 (2006); see also Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, 971 (Fed.Cir.) (“This court must always determine for itself whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case before it, even when the parties do not raise or contest the issue.”), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 614 F.3d 1330 (Fed.Cir.2010), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1169 , 131 S.Ct. 909 , 178 L.Ed.2d 804 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diaz v. United States
Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc., 546 U.S. 975 , 126 S.Ct. 543 , 163 L.Ed.2d 458 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 548 U.S. 124 , 126 S.Ct. 2921 , 165 L.Ed.2d 399 (2006); see also Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, 971 (Fed.Cir.) (“This court must always determine for itself whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case before it, even when the parties do not raise or contest the issue.”), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 614 F.3d 1330 (Fed.Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1169 , 131 S.Ct. 909 , 178 L.Ed.2d 804 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lea v. United States
Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc., 546 U.S. 975 , 126 S.Ct. 543 , 163 L.Ed.2d 458 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 548 U.S. 124 , 126 S.Ct. 2921 , 165 L.Ed.2d 399 (2006); see also Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, 971 (Fed.Cir.) (“This court must always determine for itself whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case before it, even when the parties do not raise or contest the issue.”), reh’q and reh’q en banc denied, 614 F.3d 1330 (Fed.Cir.2010). cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1169 , 131 S.Ct. 909 , 178 L.Ed.2d 804 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ogunniyi v. United States
Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc., 546 U.S. 975 , 126 S.Ct. 543 , 163 L.Ed.2d 458 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 548 U.S. 124 , 126 S.Ct. 2921 , 165 L.Ed.2d 399 (2006); see also Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, 971 (Fed,Cir.) (“This court must always determine for itself whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case before it, even when the parties do not raise or contest the issue”), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 614 F.3d 1330 (Fed.Cir.2010), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1169 , 131 S.Ct. 909 , 178 L.Ed.2d 804 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aziz El ex rel. Kamal-Jalal v. United States
Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc., 546 U.S. 975 , 126 S.Ct. 543 , 163 L.Ed.2d 458 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 548 U.S. 124 , 126 S.Ct. 2921 , 165 L.Ed.2d 399 (2006); see also Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, 971 (Fed.Cir.) (“This court must always determine for itself whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case before it, even when the parties do not raise or contest the issue ”), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 614 F.3d 1330 (Fed.Cir.2010), ce rt. denied, 562 U.S. 1169 , 131 S.Ct. 909 , 178 L.Ed.2d 804 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nie v. United States
Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc. 546 U.S. 975 , 126 S.Ct. 543 , 163 L.Ed.2d 458 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 548 U.S. 124 , 126 S.Ct. 2921 , 165 L.Ed.2d 399 (2006); see also Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, 971 (Fed.Cir.) (“This court must always determine for itself whether it has jurisdiction to hear the ease before it, even when the parties do not raise or contest the issue.”), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 614 F.3d 1330 (Fed.Cir.2010). cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1169 , 131 S.Ct. 909 , 178 L.Ed.2d 804 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Little v. United States
Cir. 2004), cert. granted in part, 546 U.S. 975 , 126 S.Ct. 543 , 163 L.Ed.2d 458 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 548 U.S. 124 , 126 S.Ct. 2921 , 165 L.Ed.2d 399 (2006); see also Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, 971 (Fed.Cir.) (“This court must always determine for itself whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case before it, even when the parties do not raise or contest the issue.”), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 614 F.3d 1330 (Fed.Cir.2010), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1169 , 131 S.Ct. 909 , 178 L.Ed.2d 804 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cordova v. United States
Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc., 546 U.S. 975 , 126 S.Ct. 543 , 163 L.Ed.2d 458 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 548 U.S. 124 , 126 S.Ct. 2921 , 165 L.Ed.2d 399 (2006); see also Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, 971 (Fed.Cir.) (“This court must always determine for itself whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case before it, even when the parties do not raise or contest the issue.”), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 614 F.3d 1330 (Fed.Cir.2010), cert. denied 5 U.S. 1169 , 131 S.Ct. 909 , 178 L.Ed.2d 804 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Woodruff v. United States
Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc., 546 U.S. 975 , 126 S.Ct. 543 , 163 L.Ed.2d 458 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 548 U.S. 124 , 126 S.Ct. 2921 , 165 L.Ed.2d 399 (2006); see also Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, 971 (Fed.Cir.) (“This court must always determine for itself whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case before it, even when the parties do not raise or contest the issue”), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 614 F.3d 1330 (Fed.Cir.2010). cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1169 , 131 S.Ct. 909 , 178 L.Ed.2d 804 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milgroom v. United States
Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc., 546 U.S. 975 , 126 S.Ct. 543 , 163 L.Ed.2d 458 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 548 U.S. 124 , 126 S.Ct. 2921 , 165 L.Ed.2d 399 (2006); see also Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, 971 (Fed.Cir.) (“This court must always determine for itself whether it has jurisdiction to hear the ease before it, even'when the parties do not raise or contest the issue.”), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 614 F.3d 1330 (Fed.Cir.2010), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1169 , 131 S.Ct. 909 , 178 L.Ed.2d 804 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. United States
Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc., 546 U.S. 975 , 126 S.Ct. 543 , 163 L.Ed.2d *506 458 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 548 U.S. 124 , 126 S.Ct. 2921 , 165 L.Ed.2d 399 (2006); see also Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, 971 (Fed.Cir.) (“This court must always determine for itself whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case before it, even when the parties do not raise or contest the issue.”), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 614 F.3d 1330 (Fed.Cir.2010), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1169 , 131 S.Ct. 909 , 178 L.Ed.2d 804 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Veasey v. United States
Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc., 546 U.S. 975 , 126 S.Ct. 543 , 163 L.Ed.2d 458 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 548 U.S. 124 , 126 S.Ct. 2921 , 165 L.Ed.2d 399 (2006); see also Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, 971 (Fed.Cir.) (“This court must always determine for itself whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case before it, even when the parties do not raise or contest the issue.”), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 614 F.3d 1330 (Fed.Cir.2010). cer t. denied, 562 U.S. 1169 , 131 S.Ct. 909 , 178 L.Ed.2d 804 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baber v. United States
Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc., 546 U.S. 975 , 126 S.Ct. 543 , 163 L.Ed.2d 458 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 548 U.S. 124 , 126 S.Ct. 2921 , 165 L.Ed.2d 399 (2006); see also Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, 971 (Fed.Cir.) (“This court must always determine for itself whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case before it, even when the parties do not raise or contest the issue.”), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 614 F.3d 1330 (Fed.Cir.2010), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1169 , 131 S.Ct. 909 , 178 L.Ed.2d 804 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martti v. United States
Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc., 546 U.S. 975 , 126 S.Ct. 543 , 163 L.Ed.2d 458 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 548 U.S. 124 , 126 S.Ct. 2921 , 165 L.Ed.2d 399 (2006); see also Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, 971 (Fed.Cir.) (“This court must always determine for itself whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case before it, even when the parties do not raise or contest the issue.”), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 614 F.3d 1330 (Fed.Cir.2010), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1169 , 131 S.Ct. 909 , 178 L.Ed.2d 804 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harrison v. United States
Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc., 546 U.S. 975 , 126 S.Ct. 543 , 163 L.Ed.2d 458 (2005), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 548 U.S. 124 , 126 S.Ct. 2921 , 165 L.Ed.2d 399 (2006); see also Avid Identification Sys., Inc. v. Crystal Import Corp., 603 F.3d 967, 971 (Fed.Cir.) (“This court must always determine for itself whether it has jurisdiction to hear the case before it, even when the parties do not raise or contest the issue.”), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, 614 F.3d 1330 (Fed.Cir.2010), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 909 , 178 L.Ed.2d 804 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sharon Taylor
v.
Acxiom Corporation
v.
Acxiom Corporation
No. 10-501.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 2011.
178 L. Ed. 2d 804
Consideration, Took.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.Same case below, 612 F.3d 325.