Dier v. Merck & Co., 179 L. Ed. 2d 302 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Dier v. Merck & Co., 179 L. Ed. 2d 302 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
84 citation events (84 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Joseph (lactapp, 2011-08-12)
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Joseph (2×)
La. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Barbour, 09-1258 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/24/10) , 35 So.3d 1142 , writ denied, 10-0934 (La.11/19/10), 49 So.3d 396 , cert. denied, Barbour v. Louisiana, - U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1477 , 179 L.Ed.2d 302 (2011); and State v. Taylor, 09-0041 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/4/09) , 21 So.3d 421 ; both following State v. Bertrand, 08-2215, 08-2311 (La.3/17/09), 6 So.3d 738 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Lewis (2×)
La. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Barbour, 2009-1258, p. 16 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/24/10), 35 So.3d 1142, 1151 , writ denied, 2010-0934 (La. 11/19/10), 49 So.3d 396 , cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1217 , 131 S.Ct. 1477 , 179 L.Ed.2d 302 (2011) (rejecting a defendant’s argument that a non-unanimous jury verdict violated the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, and noting “Bertrand is dispositive of defendant’s argument in this assignment of error which we find is meritless.”); State v. Frith, 2013-1133, pp. 18-19 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/22/14) , 151 So.3d 946, 957 (finding that a defendant failed to meet his burden …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Hickman (2×)
La. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Barbour, 2009-1258, p. 16 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/24/10), 35 So.3d 1142, 1151 , writ denied, 2010-0934 (La.11/19/10), 49 So.3d 396 , cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1217 , 131 S.Ct. 1477 , 179 L.Ed.2d 302 (2011) (rejecting a defendant’s argument that a non-unanimous jury verdict violated the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, and noting “Bertrand is dispositive of defendant’s argument in this assignment of error which we find is meritless.”); State v. Frith, 2013-1133, pp. 18-19 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/22/14) , 151 So.3d 946, 957 (finding that a defendant failed to meet his burden o…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Lambert
La. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Barbour, 09-1258, p. 16 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/24/10), 35 So.3d 1142, 1151 , cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1217 , 131 S.Ct. 1477 (2011), (where defendant argued that a non-unanimous jury verdict violated the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments, this Court noted that “Bertrand is disposi-tive of defendant’s argument'in this assignment of error which we find is merit-less.”); State v. Frith, 13-1133, pp. 18-19 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/22/14) , 151 So.3d 946, 957 (“The defendant has failed to meet his burden of proving either that La.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ingram v. Goodwin (2×)
W.D. La. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Barbour v. La., — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 1477 , 179 L.Ed.2d 302 (2011) and Herrera v. Or., — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 904 , 178 L.Ed.2d 748 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Glenn L. Dier
v.
Merck & Company, Inc.
No. 10-666.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 2011.
179 L. Ed. 2d 302
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 388 Fed. Appx. 391.