green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Southgate Master Fund, L.L.C. Ex Rel. Montgomery Capital Advisors, LLC v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Hood, 615 F.3d 1293, 1299 (10th Cir.2010) (describing the question of intent as " 'the quintessential factual question’ ” (quoting United States v. Smith, 534 F.3d 1211, 1224 (10th Cir.2008))), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1546 , 179 L.Ed.2d 356 (2011); Bodenheimer v. PPG Indus., Inc., 5 F.3d 955, 956 n. 3 (5th Cir.1993) ("[I]ntent is inherently a question of fact which turns on credibility.”); USX Corp. v. Prime Leasing Inc., 988 F.2d 433, 437 (3d Cir.1993) (noting "the fact questions inherent in [the] determination of the intent of the contracting parti…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paulino Cruz-Ramos
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 10-8533.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 2011.
179 L. Ed. 2d 356
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Same case below, 398 Fed. Appx. 75.