Rehberg v. Paulk, 179 L. Ed. 2d 645 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Rehberg v. Paulk, 179 L. Ed. 2d 645 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a person to whom a statute properly applies can't obtain relief based on arguments that a differently situated person might present.”
29 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Kwong v. Bloomberg (ca2, 2013-07-09)
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Kwong v. Bloomberg
2d Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
a person to whom a statute properly applies can't obtain relief based on arguments that a differently situated person might present.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Johnston v. State
N.C. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
o one doubts that the goal of 922(g)(9), preventing armed mayhem, is an important governmental objective.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hightower v. City of Boston
1st Cir. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Two courts have rejected facial challenges in the Second Amendment context on the basis that "a person ... to whom a statute was constitutionally applied, 'will not be heard to challenge that statute on the ground *78 that it may conceivably be applied unconstitutionally to others, in other situations not before the Court.' ” Masciandaro, 638 F.3d at 474 (quoting Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601, 610 , 93 S.Ct. 2908 , 37 L.Ed.2d 830 (1973)); see also United States v. Skoien, 614 F.3d 638, 645 (7th Cir.2010) (en banc) ("A person to whom a statute properly applies can’t obtain relief base…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." M. Taylor v. Chief Thomas Streicher
6th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Macko v. Byron, 760 F.2d 95, 97 (6th Cir.1985) (citing Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 , 103 S.Ct. 1108 , 75 L.Ed.2d 96 (1983) (analyzing a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for perjured testimony and holding that witnesses in judicial proceedings, generally, are protected by absolute immunity)); see also Rehberg v. Paulk, 611 F.3d 828, 841 (11th Cir.2010), cert. granted, U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1678 , 179 L.Ed.2d 645 (2011), (“a witness has absolute immunity from civil liability based on his grand jury testimony” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)); Anthony v. Baker, 955 F.2d 1395, …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Patel
N.C. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Bierenbaum v. Graham, 607 F.3d 36, 59 (2d Cir. 2010) (holding defense counsel’s failure to request territorial jurisdiction instruction did not constitute IAC because “counsel could reasonably have concluded that it made no sense to request a territorial jurisdiction instruction — unsupported by any evidence — that contradicted the defense’s theory of the case”), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 179 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles A. Rehberg
v.
James P. Paulk
No. 10-788.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 21, 2011.
179 L. Ed. 2d 645
Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 76%
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1) · Court of Appeals of North Caro… (1)

Motion of Government Accountability Project for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit granted.

Same case below, 611 F.3d 828.