Shealey v. United States, 181 L. Ed. 2d 198 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Shealey v. United States, 181 L. Ed. 2d 198 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the point of the guidelines is to decrease sentencing disparities, an objective furthered by a within-guidelines sentence, as opposed to a sentence that varies above or below the advisory guidelines range.”
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Jonathan Waltman (ca6, 2013-07-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Jonathan Waltman
6th Cir. · 2013 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the point of the guidelines is to decrease sentencing disparities, an objective furthered by a within-guidelines sentence, as opposed to a sentence that varies above or below the advisory guidelines range.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Isaias Sarabia-Santiago
4th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 46, 51 , 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007); see also United States v. Shealey, 641 F.3d 627, 634 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 320 , 181 L.Ed.2d 198 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Donald Stanton Shealey
v.
United States
No. 11-5496.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2011.
181 L. Ed. 2d 198
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Same case below, 641 F.3d 627.