Evans v. Wetzel, 181 L. Ed. 2d 220 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Evans v. Wetzel, 181 L. Ed. 2d 220 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events (38 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Adrian Dunn (ca8, 2013-07-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Adrian Dunn
8th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Meeks, 639 F.3d 522, 528 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 350 , 471, 181 L.Ed.2d 220 , 308 (2011).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Santos Fernandez
4th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See U.S. v. Powell, 650 F.3d 388, 393 (4th Cir.), cert denied, - U.S. --, 132 S.Ct. 350 , 181 L.Ed.2d 220 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. John Womack, Jr.
4th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Powell, 650 F.3d 388, 395 (4th Cir.) (stating that sentence within correctly calculated Guidelines range is presumptively reasonable on appeal), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 350 , 181 L.Ed.2d 220 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Calvin Townsend
4th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Powell, 650 F.3d 388, 395 (4th Cir.) (noting this court presumes sentence within applicable Guidelines range to be reasonable), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 350 , 181 L.Ed.2d 220 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jose Murillo
8th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Payton, 636 F.3d 1027, 1048-49 (8th Cir.2011), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 349 , 181 L.Ed.2d 220 (2011); United States v. Cole, 657 F.3d 685, 686-88 (8th Cir.2011) (per curiam); U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1 comment, (n. 4).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Obed Chirinos
4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Powell, 650 F.3d 388, 393 (4th Cir.) (Confrontation Clause does not apply at sentencing), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 350 , 181 L.Ed.2d 220 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Nunez
4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Powell, 650 F.3d 388, 395 (4th Cir.) (noting this court presumes sentence within applicable Guidelines range to be reasonable), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 350 , 181 L.Ed.2d 220 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jilberto Villegas
4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Powell, 650 F.3d 388, 395 (4th Cir.) (noting this court presumes sentence within applicable Guidelines range to be reasonable), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 350 , 181 L.Ed.2d 220 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Scotty Simmons
4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Powell, 650 F.3d 388, 395 (4th Cir.) (noting this court presumes sentence within applicable Guidelines range to be reasonable), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 350 , 181 L.Ed.2d 220 (2011).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Sabranino Thompson
8th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Payton, 636 F.3d 1027, 1045 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 565 U.S. --, 132 S.Ct. 349 , 181 L.Ed.2d 220 (2011); United States v. Sheppard, 219 F.3d 766, 769 (8th Cir.2000).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Robert Croner
4th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Powell, 650 F.3d 388, 395 (4th Cir.) (noting this court presumes sentence within applicable Guidelines range to be reasonable), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 350 , 181 L.Ed.2d 220 (2011).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Edwards
D.D.C. · 2014 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Powell, 650 F.3d 388, 391-93 (4th Cir.2011) (holding that the Confrontation Clause does not apply at sentencing), cert. de nied,- U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 350 , 181 L.Ed.2d 220 (2011); United States v. Grubbs, 585 F.3d 793, 798-803 (4th Cir. 2009) (holding that, consistent with the Fifth and Sixth Amendments, a district court may consider uncharged conduct in determining a sentence, so long as that conduct is proven by a preponderance of the evidence); Santiago, 495 F.3d at 824 (rejecting defendant’s argument that sentencing judge could not consider uncharged conduct in …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Lewellyn Vaught
4th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Kellam, 568 F.3d 125, 147 (4th Cir.2009) (stating the standard of review); United States v. Randall, 171 F.3d 195, 210-11 (4th Cir.1999) (explaining that a defendant bears the burden of establishing that information in the presentence report the district court relied on in calculating the relevant drug quantity is incorrect); see also United States v. Powell, 650 F.3d 388, 392 (4th Cir.) (holding that a sentencing court may consider relevant information before it, including uncorroborated hearsay, “provided that the information has sufficient indicia of reliability to su…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Evans
v.
John E. Wetzel, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
No. 11-5809.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2011.
181 L. Ed. 2d 220
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 645 F.3d 650.