Starbala v. Homecomings Fin. Network, Inc., 181 L. Ed. 2d 345 (2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Starbala v. Homecomings Fin. Network, Inc., 181 L. Ed. 2d 345 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the 'plainly unreasonable' standard is ... proper given that the goal of revocation is to punish a defendant for violating the terms of the supervised release.”
65 citation events (65 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Julie Receskey (ca5, 2012-09-28)
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Julie Receskey (2×) also: Cited "see"
5th Cir. · 2012 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the 'plainly unreasonable' standard is ... proper given that the goal of revocation is to punish a defendant for violating the terms of the supervised release.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Benjamin Potts
5th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 496 , 181 L.Ed.2d 345 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Todd Culbertson
5th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 843-44 (5th Cir.2011), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 496 , 181 L.Ed.2d 345 (2011) (holding that it is improper for a district court to rely on, inter alia, the need “to provide just punishment for the offense" in determining a *242 revocation sentence where the relevant statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (e), omits this consideration).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gabino Reyes-Serna
5th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 496 , 181 L.Ed.2d 345 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Carlos Castaneda-Estupinan
5th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 844 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 496 , 181 L.Ed.2d 345 (2011); United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 519-20 (5th Cir. 2005); see also United States v. Tovar, 480 Fed.Appx. 345, 348-49 (5th Cir.2012).
cited Cited "see" State of Indiana v. David Bisard
Ind. Ct. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Temperly v. State, 933 N.E.2d 558, 566 (Ind.Ct.App.2010), trans. denied, cert. denied, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 496 , 181 L.Ed.2d 345 (2011).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Emily Tovar
5th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 684 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 496 , 181 L.Ed.2d 345 (2011).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Conrado Minora-Escarcega
5th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 496 , 181 L.Ed.2d 345 (2011).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ethiel Pearson
5th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir.) (suggesting similarity to “plain error” review), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 496 , 181 L.Ed.2d 345 (2011).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gina Shorter
5th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 496 , 181 L.Ed.2d 345 (2011).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Alfonso Ibanez
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 844 (5th Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 496 , 181 L.Ed.2d 345 (2011).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Miguel Islas-Macias
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir.2011), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 496 , 181 L.Ed.2d 345 (2011).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Roberto Avila-Mazurca
5th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 496 , 181 L.Ed.2d 345 (2011).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Chatburn
10th Cir. · 2012 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Miller, 634 F.3d 841, 844 (5th Cir.) (holding “that it is improper for a district court to rely on § 3553(a)(2)(A) for the modification or revocation of a supervised release term”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 496 , 181 L.Ed.2d 345 (2011); United States v. Crudup, 461 F.3d 433, 439 (4th Cir.2006) (noting in dicta that § 3583(e) excludes consideration of the § 3553(h)(2)(A) factors in devising a revocation sentence); United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir.2006) (“Given that § 3553(a)(2)(A) is a factor that Congress deliberately omitted fro…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Marchell Scicutella
5th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
A, intro, comment. ¶ 8(b); see also United States v. Miller, 684 F.3d 841, 843 (5th Cir.) (“[T]he goal of revocation is to punish a defendant for violating the terms of the supervised release.”), cert. denied, -U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 496 , 181 L.Ed.2d 345 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Steve Starbala, et ux.
v.
Homecomings Financial Network, Inc.
No. 11-5980.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 31, 2011.
181 L. Ed. 2d 345
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 87%
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)

Motion of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioners are allowed until November 21, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Same case below, 125 Conn. App. 901, 10 A.3d 1109.