green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jose R.
See State v. Victor O., 301 Conn. 163, 193 , 20 A.3d 669 (reviewing unpreserved claim of illegal sentence on direct appeal because state conceded that sentence was illegal), cert. denied, 565 U.S. 1039 , 132 S. Ct. 583 , 181 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Victor O.
See State v. Victor O., 301 Conn. 163, 166, 193 , 20 A.3d 669 , cert. denied, U.S. , 132 S. Ct. 583 , 181 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Thompson
A prosecutor’s excessive use of the word “victim” is objectionable when the commission of a crime is at issue “because prevalent use of the term may cause the jury to draw an improper inference that the defendant committed a crime against the complainant.”State v. Warholic, 278 Conn. 354 , 370 n.7, 897 A.2d 569 (2006); see also State v. Victor O., 301 Conn. 163 , 191 n.11, 20 A.3d 669 , cert. denied, 565 U.S. 1039 , 132 S. Ct. 583 , 181 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Cecil Thornton
v.
California
v.
California
No. 11-6317.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 2011.
181 L. Ed. 2d 429
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.