green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Rolando Serna v. Law Office of Joseph Onwuteaka, e
See Frame v. City of Ar lington, 657 F.3d 215 , 238 (5th Cir.2011) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 1561 , 182 L.Ed.2d 168 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lone Star Security & Video, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles
See Comite de Jornaleros de Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo Beach, 657 F.3d 936, 945 (9th Cir.2011) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1566 , 182 L.Ed.2d 168 (2012) (“[T]he government may impose reasonable restrictions on the time, place, or manner of protected speech, provided the restrictions are justified without refer *507 ence to the content of the regulated speech, that they are narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental interest, and that they leave open ample alternative channels for communication of the information.” (quotation marks and citation omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Landesbank Baden-Württemberg v. Capital One Financial Corp.
Corp. v. Lemgruber, 385 F.Supp.2d 200 , 215 n. 13 (S.D.N.Y.2005) (concluding that purchase of the stock of a Brazilian defendant and several of its affiliates constituted a financial operation); Travis v. Nat’l City Bank of N.Y., 23 F.Supp. 363, 365-66 (E.D.N.Y.1938) (operations were those inherent in and arising out of trust indenture relating to sale of German corporation’s bonds); see also Bin-Jiang Tao v. Citibank, N.A., 445 Fed.Appx. 951, 954 (9th Cir.2011) (unpublished), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1561 , 182 L.Ed.2d 168 (2012) (“‘[International or foreign financial opera…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Henderson v. Thomas
See, e.g., Frame v. City of Arlington, 657 F.3d 215, 246 (5th Cir.2011) (“Indeed, a municipality is granted the discretion to choose how best to make its services accessible.”), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1561 , 182 L.Ed.2d 168 (2012).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fischer
v.
Global Connector Research, Inc.
v.
Global Connector Research, Inc.
No. 11-743.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 2012.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.