Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp., 568 U.S. 1156 (2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp., 568 U.S. 1156 (2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“he complaint contains only the most conclusory of allegations that usw exercises discretionary control or authority over plan administration, management, or assets, so it cannot be considered a de facto fiduciary under erisa.”
47 citation events (47 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Van Loo v. Cajun Operating Co. (mied, 2014-12-01)
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2013 2019 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Van Loo v. Cajun Operating Co.
E.D. Mich. · 2014 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
he complaint contains only the most conclusory of allegations that usw exercises discretionary control or authority over plan administration, management, or assets, so it cannot be considered a de facto fiduciary under erisa.
cited Cited "see" Riddle v. Hickenlooper
10th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCutcheon v. FEC, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1242 , 185 L.Ed.2d 177 (2013) (noting probable jurisdiction in a challenge to aggregate contribution limits; oral argument was held October 8, 2013).
cited Cited "see" Huff v. Firstenergy Corp.
N.D. Ohio · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cataldo v. U.S. Steel Corp., 676 F.3d 542, 555 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1239 , 185 L.Ed.2d 177 (2013).
cited Cited "see" Cindy Adair v. ConAgra Foods
8th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sandifer v. U.S. Steel Corp., 678 F.3d 590, 596-97 (7th Cir.2012), cert. granted on other grounds, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1240 , 185 L.Ed.2d 177 (2013).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ramos v. Louisiana
unknown court · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
For Louisiana, see, e.g. , State v. Hodges , 349 So.2d 250 , 260 (La. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1074 , 98 S.Ct. 1262 , 55 L.Ed.2d 779 (1978) ; see also State v. Miller , 2010-718, pp. 42-43 (La.App.5Cir. 12/28/11), 83 So.3d 178 , 204, writ denied, 2012-0282 (La. 5/18/12), 89 So.3d 1191 , cert. denied, 568 U.S. 1157 , 133 S.Ct. 1238 , 185 L.Ed.2d 177 (2013) ; State v. McElveen , 2010-0172, pp. 95-96 (La.App.4Cir. 9/28/11), 73 So.3d 1033 , 1092, writ denied, 2011-2567 (La. 4/9/12), 85 So.3d 692 , cert. denied, 568 U. S. 1163 , 133 S.Ct. 1237 , 185 L.Ed.2d 188 (2013).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Smith v. Family Video Movie Club, Inc.
N.D. Ill. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
Mar. 31, 2015); see, e.g., IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez, 546 U.S. 21 , 126 S.Ct. 514 , 163 L.Ed.2d 288 (2005) (answering question in context of donning and doffing on a collective basis); see also Sandifer v. U.S. Steel Corp., 678 F.3d 590 (7th Cir.2012), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1240 , 185 L.Ed.2d 177 (U.S. 2013), and aff'd, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 870 , 187 L.Ed.2d 729 (U.S. 2014) (examining donning and doffing of worker protective gear on a collective basis). 5.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sandifer
v.
United States Steel Corp.
No. 12-417.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 2013.
568 U.S. 1156
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: E.D. Michigan (1)

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.