green
Positive treatment
8.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Douds, Kenneth Lee
CODE ANN. § Texas, –––U.S. ––––, 134 S.Ct. 902 , 187 L.Ed.2d 767 724.011(a) (West 2011).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Myers, D.
See Aviles v. Texas, — U.S. ——, 134 S.Ct. 902 , 187 L.Ed.2d 767 (2014).
cited
Cited "see"
Michael Anthony McGruder v. State
See Aviles v. State, 385 S.W.3d 110, 112 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2012, pet. ref'd), vacated, 134 S. Ct. 902 , 187 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
McGruder v. State
See Aviles v. State, 385 S.W.3d 110, 112 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2012, pet. ref'd), vacated, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 902 , 187 L.Ed.2d 767 (2014), op. on remand, 443 S.W.3d 291 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2014, no pet. h.).
cited
Cited "see"
Clayton Dean Reeder v. State
See Aviles v. State, 385 S.W.3d 110, 112 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2012, pet. refd), vacated, -U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 902 , 187 L.Ed.2d 767 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jesse Thomas Sutherland v. State
(2×)
See Aviles v. State, 385 S.W.3d 110 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2012, pet. ref'd), va cated, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 902 , 187 L.Ed.2d 767 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leal, Jonathan Albert
See stipulated to the prior convictions at trial and does not McNeely, 133 S. Ct. at 1563 ; see also Aviles v. Texas, contest that Hodges complied with the statute by U.S. , , 134 S. Ct. 902 , 902, 187 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rex Baker v. State
See id., slip op. at 5–6 (citing Aviles v. State, No. 04-11-00877-CR, 2014 WL 3843756 , at *2–3 (Tex. App.–San Antonio Aug. 6, 2014, pet. filed) (op., not designated for publication); State v. Ballard, No. 11-13-00224-CR, 2014 WL 3865815 , at *3 (Tex. App.–Eastland July 31, 2014, no pet. h.) (mem op., not designated for publication); Weems v. State, No. 04-13-00366-CR, 2014 WL 2532299, at *8 (Tex. App.–San Antonio May 14, 2014, pet. filed) (op., not designated for publication); Sutherland v. State, No. 07-12-00289-CR, 2014 WL 1370118 , at *1–2 (Tex. App.–Amarillo Apr. 7, 2014, pe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jonathan Albert Leal v. State
See McNeely, 133 S.Ct. at 1563 ; see also Aviles v. Texas, — U.S. -, -, 134 S.Ct. 902, 902 , 187 L.Ed.2d 767 (2014) (remanding, for consideration in light of McNeely, factually similar case involving repeat-offender provision of implied-consent law); Tex. Dept. of Pub.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ricky Arnold Welch v. State
See id., slip op. at 5–6 (citing Aviles v. State, No. 04-11-00877-CR, 2014 WL 3843756 , at *2–3 (Tex. App.–San Antonio Aug. 6, 2014, pet. filed) (op., not designated for publication); State v. Ballard, No. 11-13-00224-CR, 2014 WL 3865815 , at *3 (Tex. App.–Eastland July 31, 2014, no pet. h.) (mem op., not designated for publication); Weems v. State, No. 04-13-00366-CR, 2014 WL 2532299, at *8 (Tex. App.–San Antonio May 14, 2014, pet. filed) (op., not designated for publication); Sutherland v. State, No. 07-12-00289-CR, 2014 WL 1370118 , at *1–2 (Tex. App.–Amarillo Apr. 7, 2014, pe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joaquin Sosa Salazar v. State
See id., slip op. at 5–6 (citing Aviles v. State, No. 04-11-00877-CR, 2014 WL 3843756 , at *2–3 (Tex. App.–San Antonio Aug. 6, 2014, pet. filed) (op., not designated for publication); State v. Ballard, No. 11-13-00224-CR, 2014 WL 3865815 , at *3 (Tex. App.–Eastland July 31, 2014, no pet. h.) (mem op., not designated for publication); Weems v. State, No. 04-13-00366-CR, 2014 WL 2532299, at *8 (Tex. App.–San Antonio May 14, 2014, pet. filed) (op., not designated for publication); Sutherland v. State, No. 07-12-00289-CR, 2014 WL 1370118 , at *1–2 (Tex. App.–Amarillo Apr. 7, 2014, pe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Joe Lyssy v. State
See, e.g., Aviles v. Texas, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 902 , 187 L.Ed.2d 767 (2014) (order vacating judgment and remanding case for reconsideration in light of McNeely). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph K. NEWBOLD
v.
UNITED STATES.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 12–10871..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 2014.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Case below, 490 Fed.Appx. 614.
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of that court's opinion in Miller v. United States, 735 F.3d 141 (C.A.4 2013).