Scott v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 2315 (2014). · Go Syfert
Search
Scott v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 2315 (2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: State v. Lacey (or, 2018-12-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Lacey
Or. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Stanley , 739 F.3d 633 , 649-50 (11th Cir.), cert. den., 572 U.S. 1126 , 134 S.Ct. 2317 , 189 L.Ed.2d 195 (2014) (holding that trial court did not err in proceeding with trial after pro se defendant absconded, because defendant's flight alone did not indicate unambiguously a desire to revoke his valid Sixth Amendment waiver and reinstate counsel); People v. Brante , 232 P.3d 204 , 208-09 (Colo App 2009) ("[T]he trial court did not violate [the defendant's] Sixth Amendment right to counsel by declining sua sponte to appoint advisory counsel to take over the defense in …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anthony SCOTT
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 13–9630..
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 2014.
134 S. Ct. 2315
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.