Sonic-Calabasas v. Moreno, 134 S. Ct. 2724 (2014). · Go Syfert
Search
Sonic-Calabasas v. Moreno, 134 S. Ct. 2724 (2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
91 citation events (91 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jose Ronderos v. Usf Reddaway, Inc. (ca9, 2024-08-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Jose Ronderos v. Usf Reddaway, Inc.
9th Cir. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sonic- Calabasas A, Inc. v. Moreno, 311 P.3d 184 , 201–03 (Cal. 2013), cert denied 134 S. Ct. 2724 (2014).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Mcmanus, M.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cunningham v. Pennsylvania, 134 S. Ct. 2724 (2014).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Miller, J.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Cunningham, 81 A.3d 1 (Pa. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2724 (2014).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Walker, C. (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Cunningham, 622 Pa. 543 , 81 A.3d 1 (2013), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2724 , 189 L.Ed.2d 763 (2014).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Wilson, M.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Cunningham, 81 A.3d 1, 11 (Pa. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2724 (2014).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Brabham, B.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cunningham v. Pennsylvania, 134 S.Ct. 2724 (U.S. 2014).
discussed Cited "see" Moore v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. (2×)
C.D. Cal. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. Moreno, 57 Cal.4th 1109, 1127-28 , 163 Cal.Rptr.3d 269 , 311 P.3d 184 (2013), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 2724 , 189 L.Ed.2d 763 (2014).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Goodwin, J.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Cunningham, 81 A.3d 1, 10 (Pa. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2724 (2014).6 Consequently, a petitioner cannot rely on Miller v. Alabama or 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(1)(iii) to establish jurisdiction over an untimely PCRA petition.
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Ortiz, M.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cunningham v. Pennsylvania, 134 S.Ct. 2724 (U.S. 2014).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Dunn, A. (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cunningham v. Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 2724 , 189 L.Ed.2d 763 (2014).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Davenport, K.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pennsylvania v. Cunningham, 134 S. Ct. 2724 (2014).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Mcmanus, M.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cunningham v. Pennsylvania, 134 S. Ct. 2724 (2014).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Ross, S.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cunningham v. Pennsylvania, 134 S. Ct. 2724 (2014).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Young, C.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(3). -9- J-S55042-14 Preliminarily, we note the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the Miller decision does not apply retroactively to benefit offenders seeking collateral review because it “‘does not categorically bar a penalty for a class of offenders.’” Commonwealth v. Cunningham, 81 A.3d. 1, 10 (Pa. 2013) (quotation omitted), cert. denied, 134 S.Ct. 2724 (U.S. 2014).9 Therefore, Young’s collateral claim does not satisfy the “newly recognized constitutional right” exception to the PCRA timing requirements.
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Williams, D.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cunningham v. Pennsylvania, 134 S. Ct. 2724 (2014).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Hough, J.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cunningham v. Pennsylvania, 134 S.Ct. 2724 (June 9, 2014).
discussed Cited "see" Com. v. Miller, J. (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Cunningham, 81 A.3d 1 (Pa. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S.Ct. 2724 (2014).3 On November 6, 2013, Attorney Farrell filed a motion to stay the PCRA proceedings until the United States Supreme Court ruled upon Cunningham.
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Ortiz, W.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Cunningham, 81 A.3d 1, 11 (Pa. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S.Ct. 2724 (U.S. 2014).
cited Cited "see" Com. v. Rosario, E.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commonwealth v. Cunningham, 81 A.3d 1, 11 (Pa. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 2724 (2014) (holding that Miller does not apply retroactively). -5-
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SONIC-CALABASAS A, INC.
v.
Frank MORENO.
No. 13–856..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 9, 2014.
134 S. Ct. 2724
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California denied.