green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Martinez
See Cohen v. United States, 378 F.2d 751 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 897 , 88 S. Ct. 217 , 19 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bennefield
See Cohen v. United States, 378 F.2d 751, 760-61 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 897 , 88 S.Ct. 217 , 19 L.Ed.2d 215 (1967); see also Watkins v. Sowders, 449 U.S. 341, 345-49 , 101 S.Ct. 654, 657-59 , 66 L.Ed.2d 549 (1981); United States v. Archibald, 734 F.2d 938, 940-41 (2d Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Saraceno
See Cohen v. United States, 378 F.2d 751 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 897 , 88 S. Ct. 217 , 19 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cantu
A corollary to this guideline, of course, is that “a hearing is unnecessary when it can be determined without a hearing that suppression is improper as a matter of law.” Losing, supra, 539 F.2d at 1178 ; see Cohen v. United States, 378 F.2d 751, 760 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 897 , 88 S.Ct. 217 , 19 L.Ed.2d 215 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gambale
See United States v. Migely, 596 F.2d 511, 513 (1st Cir.), citing Cohen v. United States, 378 F.2d 751, 761 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 897 , 88 S.Ct. 217 , 19 L.Ed.2d 215 (1967) (evidentiary hearing is appropriate only if defendant alleges facts “sufficiently definite, specific, detailed, and non-conjectural, to enable the court to conclude that a substantial claim is presented”), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 943 , 99 S.Ct. 2887 , 61 L.Ed.2d 313 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sugar
See Cohen v. United States, 378 F.2d 751 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 897 , 88 S.Ct. 217 , 19 L.Ed.2d 215 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Giles v. State
See Cohen v. United States, 378 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 897 , 88 S.Ct. 217 , 19 L.Ed.2d 215 ; United States v. One 1965 Buick, 392 F.2d 672 (6th Cir. 1968).” It should be stated that it appears that failure to raise on the trial the precise issue as to the admissibility in evidence of the marijuana found in the safe that is raised on appeal does not constitute a mistake on the part of defendant or his counsel.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Desjardins
See Cohen v. United States, 378 F.2d 751 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 897 , 88 S.Ct. 217 , 19 L.Ed.2d 215 ; United States v. One 1965 Buick, 392 F.2d 672 (6th Cir. 1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. DiSalvo
See also Cohen v. United States, 378 F.2d 751, 754 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 897 , 88 S.Ct. 217 , 19 L.Ed.2d 215 *1401 (1967) (single count charging series of telephone calls during brief period not duplicitous).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stuyvesant Insurance Co.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 418.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 16, 1967.
Henry B. Rothblatt and Emma A. Rothblatt for petitioner., Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.