In re Smith, 135 S. Ct. 259 (2014).

In re Smith, 135 S. Ct. 259 (2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment Quoted verbatim 1× 18.2 score

“section 2252(a)(2) does not create distinct offenses for 'reeeiv' and 'distri-but' child pornography.”

1 citation event across 1 distinct court.

Strongest positive: United States v. Stephen Puza, III (ca3, 2015-02-12)

Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗

discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Stephen Puza, III

3rd Cir. · 2015 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high

section 2252(a)(2) does not create distinct offenses for 'reeeiv' and 'distri-but' child pornography.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

In re Nathan SMITH

No. 14–5502..

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct 6, 2014.

135 S. Ct. 259

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Published

Citer courts: Third Circuit (1)

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.